waterford103
Well-Known Member
Nice one Bewsh .keep up the good work
I'm famous (Sc*mwatch Facebook Page)
- Thread starter groach1234
- Start date
bewsher500
Well-Known Member
nothing to do with me your honour...just found it.
They also had a Scumwatch2 page when No.1 was taken down
They also had a Scumwatch2 page when No.1 was taken down
bewsher500
Well-Known Member
Got to be worthy of its own thread - Scum Watch members page
https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=s...7&sourceid=chrome&espv=210&es_sm=122&ie=UTF-8
link changed to direct you to Google then the item of the discussion
https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=s...7&sourceid=chrome&espv=210&es_sm=122&ie=UTF-8
link changed to direct you to Google then the item of the discussion
Last edited:
Paul at Fechan
Well-Known Member
pro hunters are posting... on sw
PMSL - this is fantastic! 
CWMMAN3738
Well-Known Member
Brilliant I've got a few haters to post on there too
csl
Administrator
I know I'm going to get labelled spoilsport but we all complained to Facebook about how people posting other people's details and derogatory comments on Facebook was a disgrace and now we are doing the same thing. There goes the moral high ground then. All we have in our favour now is "but they started it Miss".
Meanwhile they have got exactly what they wanted in the first place... a rise.
Personally I think any mention of Sc*m Watch should be wiped off the site and we should get on with pursuing the reason we are here in the first place, which is deer stalking.
Alex
Meanwhile they have got exactly what they wanted in the first place... a rise.
Personally I think any mention of Sc*m Watch should be wiped off the site and we should get on with pursuing the reason we are here in the first place, which is deer stalking.
Alex
rick6point5
Well-Known Member
Great well done, not sure that you all realize how much effort they will now spend on retaliatory items, i suggest any information & images currently on the web you do not want used or tagged are removed.. Admin i would agree with csl removal of any links or mentions of Sc**watch is good, so we can focus on the reason we are here. imo
atb
atb
I. Farticus
Well-Known Member
tackb
Well-Known Member
I don't think it's right we lower ourselves to their level but I'm beginning to wonder what we should do about this continual assault on us and our lifestyles because turning the other cheek is not working!
Half a a million people turned out and behaved in support of fox hunting , I saw about 100 antis spitting at us and calling us child abusers etc yet it was still banned ? Maybe their behaviour is the way to get your own way?
we should not have to put up with this persecution , it's not acceptable to other minority groups?
Half a a million people turned out and behaved in support of fox hunting , I saw about 100 antis spitting at us and calling us child abusers etc yet it was still banned ? Maybe their behaviour is the way to get your own way?
we should not have to put up with this persecution , it's not acceptable to other minority groups?
bewsher500
Well-Known Member
If you stick a photo on the web it is exactly that... on the web
no-one has any right to complain if it is used if they were stupid enough to put it there in the first place. That goes for anyone
As to the "moral high ground"...I would say inciting to hatred and violence against a minority group takes the biscuit.
I am not convinced their motivation is to "get a rise" otherwise they wouldn't go to so much trouble to delete posts and ban anyone from reposting if they are not fully in agreement with the tosh they write.
Whilst I don't condone childish "tit for tat" responses, head in the sand tactics don't do the shooting community any favours either, if Facebook are not interesting in upholding multiple complaints and someone has the time and energy to poke a bit of light hearted fun at those responsible (I note the difference in tone between the pages. no-one is threatened or anyone wishing they would die) then let them get on with it. At least people are laughing rather than feeling threatened
Perhaps if association to the site whose name we shall not speak brings ridicule then less people will want to get involved
no-one has any right to complain if it is used if they were stupid enough to put it there in the first place. That goes for anyone
As to the "moral high ground"...I would say inciting to hatred and violence against a minority group takes the biscuit.
I am not convinced their motivation is to "get a rise" otherwise they wouldn't go to so much trouble to delete posts and ban anyone from reposting if they are not fully in agreement with the tosh they write.
Whilst I don't condone childish "tit for tat" responses, head in the sand tactics don't do the shooting community any favours either, if Facebook are not interesting in upholding multiple complaints and someone has the time and energy to poke a bit of light hearted fun at those responsible (I note the difference in tone between the pages. no-one is threatened or anyone wishing they would die) then let them get on with it. At least people are laughing rather than feeling threatened
Perhaps if association to the site whose name we shall not speak brings ridicule then less people will want to get involved
People tried being reasonable and to follow the rules -it did not work!
It has become apparent that facebook dont care one bit.
You can rip someones profile off, steal their photos, post their private infiormation, harrass and bully them - and "it doesnt violate the community standards".
So, WHY should those innocent people that have had this done to them just lay back and let it happen to them??
I say let them have it!
It has become apparent that facebook dont care one bit.
You can rip someones profile off, steal their photos, post their private infiormation, harrass and bully them - and "it doesnt violate the community standards".
So, WHY should those innocent people that have had this done to them just lay back and let it happen to them??
I say let them have it!
Similar threads
