Norfolk Deer Search
Well-Known Member
I mean, this is the confidence I have in the TTSX, I’ve always said I would shoot anything up to dangerous game with 130gn Barnes ttsx from my old rust bucket Ruger m77 without question or worry!
Unfortunately not, either rem mag or PRC. Time will tell7x57 any chance?
I’ll happily share load data, I’ve done a fair bit of playing with the 7x57
If I didn’t have the 7x57 i would have had a PRC but I’m smitten with the 7x57 but the PRC certainly intrigues meUnfortunately not, either rem mag or PRC. Time will tell
Appreciate the offer though
For sure, plus the the learning curve on how it behaves.Its the cost. most people shooting deer wont notice a difference but then they likely dont shoot many rounds over land per month. My personal projectile cost will likely triple or quadruple at the current cost of copper projectiles so I'll have to reduce the amount I shoot. Some would just give up all together. There's nothing wrong with copper but they're taking away our choice
Scrap that, it’s all banned from the glorious 1st August 2029.So, what does this mean for shotgun cartridges? I assume they’ll all have to be non-lead, or are there exceptions for clay shooting grounds like there’s supposed to be for rifle ranges. I could endeavour to look it up, but if anyone can say, then that’ll save me time. And do feel free to call me lazy.![]()
Get stocking up lads!Scrap that, it’s all banned from the glorious 1st August 2029.
Ill let you know how it goesIf I didn’t have the 7x57 i would have had a PRC but I’m smitten with the 7x57 but the PRC certainly intrigues me
yep - about £60 a box for copper give or take a few quid£130 for 40 cartridges? Bloody hell. Reloading equipment makers are gonna see an uptick in business by the sounds of it.
Is that really how much factory ammo costs these days?
That is a very good price.yep - about £60 a box for copper give or take a few quid
Bought some Sako Powerhead blade copper ammo and they set me back £58 a box!
Didn't seem like it at the timeThat is a very good price.
On the earlier link to the new amendments to the REACH regulation the new paragraph 11 says lead projectiles of more than 3% lead are banned for range use and 12.b says that any projectile that is not shot and has more than 3% lead in it is banned for any other use. Both are subject to exemptions.
The main exemptions are use on a range, when it has provision for lead recovery (paragraph 13) and lead bullets of a calibre less than 6.17mm (paragraph 23.a).
While .243 bullets are commonly called 6mm, that’s just a rounding. If you measure them they’re .243” which, as others have said, is 6.1722mm.
So, lead is banned for anything .243 or above unless on a range - what’s printed on boxes doesn’t matter.
You’ll find they are 6.15, made to travel down a bore on bottom tolerance.243 bullets are 6.2mm, I believe.
(Edit: I just googled it. They're 6.17mm).
Call in at Specsavers next time you are passing?Looking at it, it looks like it's the sale which is being banned so technically if people stock up on lead now/before the date it may still be legal to use for live quarry until they run out.
Looking at it, it looks like it's the sale which is being banned so technically if people stock up on lead now/before the date it may still be legal to use for live quarry until they run out.
Ah yes, missed 'used'. Thanks for correcting.Call in at Specsavers next time you are passing?
So all we then need is some deer on a pontoon flying the Jolly Roger and we're good?Quote: “calibre” means the measurement of the interior (also known as “the bore”) of a firearm’s barrel and the diameter of projectile used".
So that also puts that line of reasoning to bed.
Now if someone really wanted to use lead, perhaps they could start a private maritime security company, which seems exempt in Paragraph 26.
Alas, yes, it's a catch all sad to say. Thank you for your good humour in respect of my comment.Ah yes, missed 'used'. Thanks for correcting.