Leglas
Well-Known Member
I'm still only a couple of years into stalking, and to having a FAC (half of which has been scuppered with covid). One piece of advice I'd been given several times was to get a decent rifle but spend my money on the best optics I could. I'd been using a second hand (read: pretty battered) Remington 700 with an old Swarovski 6x42, which was great and certainly did the job, but having really got into the hobby I wanted to get a decent scope. Now I know that something like a Z8 or a Zeiss Victory would be a good blend of optical quality and wouldn't weigh too much, but back in April I had read less on what made a good scope in the context of stalking and more on what made the 'best scope', so, when a new Schmidt and Bender PM2 5-25x56 came up at a really good price, I decided it was the one to invest in. I've not shot since getting it and I've now traded in the 700 in 308 for a Schultz and Larsen Victory in 6.5C.
My questions is this - the S&B is 1.2KG or thereabouts, which is the weight of a bipod or a GRS stock above a good 'stalking scope', is this the only issue with it as a stalking scope? I admit, I will feel silly turning up to go stalking with optics designed to take out Taliban insurgents, but then the reputed robustness of it does appeal to me and I'm not convinced a few hundred extra grams overall will make a difference, especially for a man shooting off sticks who could himself shed a few stones to make a day in the hills easier.
My questions is this - the S&B is 1.2KG or thereabouts, which is the weight of a bipod or a GRS stock above a good 'stalking scope', is this the only issue with it as a stalking scope? I admit, I will feel silly turning up to go stalking with optics designed to take out Taliban insurgents, but then the reputed robustness of it does appeal to me and I'm not convinced a few hundred extra grams overall will make a difference, especially for a man shooting off sticks who could himself shed a few stones to make a day in the hills easier.