Seating dearth and pressure

Ttocs

Well-Known Member
Just a quick question for the experts.
I’ve been very lucky with my load development for all my rifles but for my 17 REM. Usually I find a powder charge that gives a 1 hole group with similar results when looking at charge weights either side. I found a reasonable group 1”, with similar groups either side, for the 17 but would like to reduce this.
So my next plan is to fiddle with the seating depth; I’m thinking several .005” steps either side of my current c.o.a.l.
My question, clearly moving the bullet and increasing/decreasing the volume of the cartridge will affect pressure, but how much? Could it be enough to cause a spike in pressure?
Cheers
N
 
My tiny little bullets have an almost .2” jump to the lands ( yes 5mm) from SAAMI spec.; if I have a minimum seating depth equal to the bullet diameter I can’t get anywhere near the lands. I think I’m just playing with case volume by adjusting the seating depth.
N
 
Just a quick question for the experts.
I’ve been very lucky with my load development for all my rifles but for my 17 REM. Usually I find a powder charge that gives a 1 hole group with similar results when looking at charge weights either side. I found a reasonable group 1”, with similar groups either side, for the 17 but would like to reduce this.
So my next plan is to fiddle with the seating depth; I’m thinking several .005” steps either side of my current c.o.a.l.
My question, clearly moving the bullet and increasing/decreasing the volume of the cartridge will affect pressure, but how much? Could it be enough to cause a spike in pressure?
Cheers
N
Depends on how hot your load is to start with. I 've not had to experiment with seating depth to get my 17 Rem to shoot bugholes, just standard c.o.a.l.
 
How long are you loading now?

Personally I just load to SAAMI max OAL and be done with it, so I dont really have much option to lengthen things further in any case!
 
the impact length has on pressure and velocity depends where you are on the curve, it's not a straight line relationship.
In many cases moving about is fine, in others shortening a load by just a little can go from ok to stiff bolt and flat primers.
chrono is always useful as is staying in the realms of published data.
 
I found the 17 REM to be an interesting cartridge to load and it is the one that came closest to kicking my butt with a rapid pressure spike. One thing I would advise is to start load testing with a very clean barrel. My rifle does about 50 rounds then opens up. I use an abrasive cleaning paste every time on my 17
 
I found the 17 REM to be an interesting cartridge to load and it is the one that came closest to kicking my butt with a rapid pressure spike. One thing I would advise is to start load testing with a very clean barrel. My rifle does about 50 rounds then opens up. I use an abrasive cleaning paste every time on my 17
you hoping to make it a 19 Rem soon?
 
Thanks for the replies. I’ve had the rifle for 3 years now and after nearly 300 rounds of development (latest 40 rounds was with a barrel tuner) I’m not getting the groups I’d like.

My current load has:
a coal of 2.154” (SAAMI 2.150” & Nosler data 2.140”) not quite sure how I ended up at 2.154
23.8gr N135
Rem 71/2 primer
Rem case
20gr Nosler Varmageddon

I’m thinking time for a change of barrel if seating depth doesn’t pull things together (perhaps even if it works)
 

Attachments

  • C75609C0-7A50-4B32-9FC0-6744216730EE.webp
    C75609C0-7A50-4B32-9FC0-6744216730EE.webp
    150.1 KB · Views: 11
Back
Top