SGA lead free ammo survey results

[Smellydog]

Please stick to the topic.

Is that a forum rule and are you in a position to direct other members?

 

[Ruger#1]

Your continued ad hominem arguments are immature and unnecessary. Please stick to the topic.

Your own ad hominem comments ,used to deflect from your reluctance to address the points raised , are a consistent tactic employed when you are unwilling to address on topic issues.
If you are unable to accept the hypocrisy in devoting many hours promoting anti lead shot information based on inconclusive data then proudly proclaiming BASC has always said a big fat no to further lead shot restrictions then I see no point in drawing your attention to the fact. You are obviously aware of the contradiction.

 

[levigsp]

Not being sarcastic. If you read the Ohanian article on heavy metals and AML, the actual levels are very much below what is considered to be “normal”. “Normal” probably means you are not suffering acute lead poisoning. You are also forgetting that lead is accumulative and its goes from the blood into bone etc. Your body can only get rid of lead if you use chelation. So as you carry on eating lead contaminated meat more will be absorbed. Perhaps not a lot each time, but a little accumulates.

But as I said previously, it’s your body.

My Sister is a medical bio chemist, and she says I am fine on the lead front, as do the surgeons and medical experts at Aberdeen hospital.
But they all agree my Fluoride and Chloride levels are very high.
Incidentally you and nearly everybody in the UK get far more usable lead compounds into your body by eating normal everyday foods than you do eating lead shot meat.
As I said, you keep believing in the propaganda and fairy stories, doesn't matter to me. one bit

 

[David Barker]

Just s HIT my self just read through this full thread and realised i had been sucking a pencil blunt end. Just asked the wife to suck the poison out and she said no i am busy looking for your life insurance policy.

 

[Conor O'Gorman]

Your own ad hominem comments ,used to deflect from your reluctance to address the points raised , are a consistent tactic employed when you are unwilling to address on topic issues.
If you are unable to accept the hypocrisy in devoting many hours promoting anti lead shot information based on inconclusive data then proudly proclaiming BASC has always said a big fat no to further lead shot restrictions then I see no point in drawing your attention to the fact. You are obviously aware of the contradiction.

This topic is about a SGA survey of deer stalkers seeking their opinions on the use of copper ammunition in Scotland's forests. Your first comment in this thread is to have a go at me/BASC, completely off topic. So far its 118 comments from you on SD, most targeting me/BASC with trolling comments, so let's remind ourselves that you joined this forum to continue your PW trolling activities and not to discuss deer stalking, as you alleged in your intro. Give it a rest please.

 

[Ruger#1]

This topic is about a SGA survey of deer stalkers seeking their opinions on the use of copper ammunition in Scotland's forests. Your first comment in this thread is to have a go at me/BASC, completely off topic. So far its 118 comments from you on SD, most targeting me/BASC with trolling comments, so let's remind ourselves that you joined this forum to continue your PW trolling activities and not to discuss deer stalking, as you alleged in your intro. Give it a rest please.

You seem to have cornered the market in ad hominem comments.
As my post was in response to your comment that BASC had always said a big fat no to lead shot restrictions it was entirely on topic.
I suggest that if you are so triggered by my comments you should put me on ignore.
I understand your frustration at having your posts questioned but highlighting the hypocrisy contained in your posts is not trolling and would be better dealt with by you responding to the concerns raised rather than attempting to silence debate.
I stated earlier that my goal is using the forum to access knowledge for my DSC1 which I have done over the past few months. I am unable to contribute much in the way of discussion but will do in the future. A move from BASC to BDS this year should put me on the right road to contribute more fully in the forum.
I am however able to express an opinion on the lead ammunition issue and will continue to do so. Rather than seek to censor me would it not be easier to either counter the points I raise or put me on ignore.
I think you’ll find all my posts address points made on threads and the only person prone to making personal remarks is yourself.

 

[Norfolk Deer Search]

You seem to have cornered the market in ad hominem comments.
As my post was in response to your comment that BASC had always said a big fat no to lead shot restrictions it was entirely on topic.
I suggest that if you are so triggered by my comments you should put me on ignore.
I understand your frustration at having your posts questioned but highlighting the hypocrisy contained in your posts is not trolling and would be better dealt with by you responding to the concerns raised rather than attempting to silence debate.
I stated earlier that my goal is using the forum to access knowledge for my DSC1 which I have done over the past few months. I am unable to contribute much in the way of discussion but will do in the future. A move from BASC to BDS this year should put me on the right road to contribute more fully in the forum.
I am however able to express an opinion on the lead ammunition issue and will continue to do so. Rather than seek to censor me would it not be easier to either counter the points I raise or put me on ignore.
I think you’ll find all my posts address points made on threads and the only person prone to making personal remarks is yourself.

Nicely said that man

 

[Conor O'Gorman]

You seem to have cornered the market in ad hominem comments.
As my post was in response to your comment that BASC had always said a big fat no to lead shot restrictions it was entirely on topic.
I suggest that if you are so triggered by my comments you should put me on ignore.
I understand your frustration at having your posts questioned but highlighting the hypocrisy contained in your posts is not trolling and would be better dealt with by you responding to the concerns raised rather than attempting to silence debate.
I stated earlier that my goal is using the forum to access knowledge for my DSC1 which I have done over the past few months. I am unable to contribute much in the way of discussion but will do in the future. A move from BASC to BDS this year should put me on the right road to contribute more fully in the forum.
I am however able to express an opinion on the lead ammunition issue and will continue to do so. Rather than seek to censor me would it not be easier to either counter the points I raise or put me on ignore.
I think you’ll find all my posts address points made on threads and the only person prone to making personal remarks is yourself.

Ignore list it is then and I can't recall ever having to do this before after 13 years on this forum and that speaks volumes as regards your untoward behaviour.

 

[Ruger#1]

Ignore list it is then and I can't recall ever having to do this before after 13 years on this forum and that speaks volumes as regards your untoward behaviour.

Thank you. As you have rarely ,if ever ,to date responded to the legitimate concerns I have raised regarding your posts in defence of further lead shot restrictions there will be no reduction in the level of debate incurred by your action.

 

[Smellydog]

Ignore list it is then and I can't recall ever having to do this before after 13 years on this forum and that speaks volumes as regards your untoward behaviour.

Ahhhr ****, I wanted to be your first