that all very nice BUT where does it say in the guidelines that it had to be done?
Can you answer me that please.
The guidelines say they should make enquiries and ask lots of questions. Chapter 12 of the Guidelines states
“The guiding principle behind the requirement to have a “good reason” to possess, purchase or acquire firearms or ammunition, is that firearms are dangerous weapons and the state has a duty to protect the public from their misuse. In general, applicants should be able to demonstrate that they ‘use’ their firearm on a regular, legitimate basis for work, sport or leisure (including collections or research).”
Then it goes onto say:
“Apart from assessing fitness to possess firearms, “good reason” is one of the most substantial and complex areas of discretion that chief officers may exercise in licensing firearms.”
And further down
“12.4 Apart from having a “good reason” in principle, an applicant’s reasons for owning firearms should be genuine. Equally, any reason to refuse an application must be clearly justified and explained. Chief officers should exercise caution in dealing with cases where the applicant presents a nominal reason for possessing firearms without supporting evidence. The police will be expected to make reasonable inquiries to verify the applicant’s “good reason” for the possession of firearms.”
Please do note where it says the “applicant presents a nominal reason for possessing firearms but without the supporting evidence”
So evidence such as letters of permission, details of premises and facilities along with stalking records, cull returns etc etc all go along to provide such supporting evidence of the need for possession. There is no definitive list, nor is there a list of questions which they cannot ask.
If you cannot demonstrate nor provide supporting evidence to support your application or renewal, or decide that the police have no right to ask such questions, they have the right to decide that you haven’t met the threshold required.
The threshold is no much higher than it used to be. Yes, this is thanks in part to poor decisions made by some constabularies, but any FAC decision is likely to be subject to independent scrutiny. Independent scrutiny will be there to determine whether or not the Police have asked the appropriate questions.
So if a rifle has been granted for Deer stalking - where is the supporting evidence?