Trophy hunting

Who the feck woke him up
it took him 75 years to come to this conclusion, another nobody who just had to get back into the media.....total bulls**t
 
I would have thought I’m the least bullying bastard about.Comparing hunting with poaching for animal parts for medicines in China and the likes what planet is he on.Just Ill informed drivel from a look at me I’m a celebrity get me back in there. Public eye that is.
 
You have to remember he is probably the greatest living explorer, a truely amazing individual who has done more in a lifetime than most would do in ten lifetimes, you also have to remember he is as mad as a March hare and has done some of the dumbest things imaginable like sawing off his fingers.
 
Is he too scared of losing his status if he bags out on Libby and Phil? They both shot tigers in India too,bloody good luck to them of course.
 
Ricky Gervais was on BBC news this morning (didn't catch it myself). This CBTH group are getting press coverage every two or three days. Whether it is true or not does not matter it seems. There is a lot of hard science on the hunting side of the argument but this does not count in the MSM.
 
Well lets take into account all the Buffalo slaughtered by the Americans to starve out the American Indians, or maybe the Quagga and Blaubok wiped out by the early Dutch settlers in South Africa, or lets go further back and look at the Dodo wiped out by various ships visiting its island home and killing them just to make lamp oil. Or how about the early New Zealand settlers bringing rats, foxes, domestic cats etc which has been responsible for the demise of many of the unique animals found there.

The fact is this is another person who makes a statement and the general public agree, because like sheep they follow some one who they believe to be experienced in what he is talking about. So answer me this, Mr Fiennes, as you have produced a photo of some white Europeans with a dead Tiger this is what you are using to illustrate your belief??

Funny how most of the Tiger sanctuaries in India are the old established hunting grounds of the Raj and white English rulers at the time. Now Tigers are on the increase again, and if it were not for some of these places Tigers would probably not have survived there today. Besides I think you will find that it was many early hunters and explorers that defined some of the species of today. This includes people such as Selous and Major Powell - Cotton, the later discovered some 50 new sub species before his death in 1940.

Its incredible that someone who has done so much to explore our world, is in my opinion totally out of touch with the past history and some of the old explorers and hunters who braved areas of the world where you have visited with modern technology. Those past men bought the world of natural history to the many, and deserve better credit than you are giving them.

And by the way if your happen to read this, I spent over 30 years working my way up the ladder in the Powell - Cotton Museum to become Curator/Director, working eventually with many notable anthropologists and zoologists from around the world, and have also carried out taking skin samples for DNA analysis for such projects as the Giant Sable, Simitar Oryx, Lowland Gorilla and the Quagga to name but a few.

Thank you, but you are totally wrong in my opinion.
 
Funnily enough, just reading through Fiennes' book "The Elite" - sorry to say it's a real disappointment, like a schoolboys potted history of the special forces with a couple of reminiscences of when Fiennes was in the SAS (briefly) and how brave he was trundling around the world on various expeditions. If you get the chance to buy the book, give it a miss and get something more challenging and readable instead. Also caught the comments of that well known comedian and activist Gervais spouting forth on the BBC breakfast show - giving his well thought out professional opinion (sic), perhaps these two bit comedians should keep to presenting other luvvies with awards rather than commenting on grown up stuff! There was also some other drivel from an anti - as usual given the final word by the hand wringing BBC as opposed to letting the man-on-the-ground in Botswana (who came across well ) have his final say about the link between the income from Trophy Hunting and Anti Poaching patrols.
 
I saw a bit of that article

It was a deliberate and appalling misrepresentation of stats and 'fact'

I felt it went unchallenged by the guy from Botswana

Yet again a pretence of balance from the Beeb - in reality it was a highly skewed piece of drivel
 
Back
Top