What's your experience with Blaser R93

Hunter 6.5

Well-Known Member
Interested what you guys think about R93! I might be able to get one but then reading a horror stories of bolt making his way back through the shooter face :-|. It was on long range hunting I believe. Is any truth on this? Are they reliable?
I know there is no parts available for them anymore but if it's in good condition it will last long enough. Thanks
 
Had one for about 5 years, in professional stock guise.

Pros:
Ability to breakdown, for travelling, cleaning etc.
Accurate (most rifles tend to be anyway)
Compact - typically 3” shorter for any given barrel length due to action/bolt arrangement.
Good value compared to R8

Cons:
I didn’t take to the straight pull.
Blind magazine
Stock quality not great - quite a bit of flex.

I’ve gone back to a traditional bolt action. But if you’re looking for a compact, easily broken down rifle with return to zero at an more manageable price point compared to an R8 then you won’t go wrong.
 
I have one in 7x57 with a calibre conversion to .416 Remington magnum, have been shooting in for nearly 20 years now. The "horror" stories are based on an American who managed to blow up his Blaser with his own home loads and made a career out of attending gun shows with a "don't buy Blaser routine"
There's a lot of Blaser envy on this forum and others but simply put you don't like them don't buy one.

The scope mounts are interchangeable between R93 and R8 but stick to original Blaser if you really want to be sure of keeping point of aim when you detach/ attach scopes.
 
You are unlikely to find anyone with first hand experience of a blow up as I don't believe there were many but there were some? Blaser tight lipped but don't deny? There is speculation that is what drove the design changes to the R8 bolt.

Equally we have no idea of the circumstances. If one was going to give up during a "reloading adventure" then there is nowt to stop it coming back if the collet fails. Reloading adventures of that kind are bad news irrespective of what you are holding, it doesn't have to get you in the chops to kill you.

I have an R8 so not a hater...
 
I brought my first one in 2009, I've now got, 243, 6.5x57, 308, 300WM x 7x64, I'm currently looking for another stock and 375HH barrel.
 
Had a R93 Luxus when they first came out. If I remember correctly, some of them suffered from a faulty bolt. I know this issue was solved relatively quickly. I liked the look of the rifle and the straight pull bolt. Unfortunately I had to sell it because of a divorce.
Have often thought about buying another, but haven’t gotten around to it….probably never will.
 
In 1994, after a shooting accident near Koblenz in Germany, the R93 was criticised with claims that it could not withstand high pressures, and that the bolt would unlock when excessive pressures were generated.[citation needed]

In August 2003, 41-year-old Norwegian Jan Sørlie had an accident where his R93 chambered for 8×68mm S exploded, resulting in loss of an eye and a skull fracture requiring titanium replacement.[20][21] Sørlie reported that had used handloaded ammunition loaded with 5.05 g (77.9 gr) Norma MRP powder and a 12.7 g (196 gr) projectile.[20][21]

In January 2004, 38-year-old German Albrecht Huf had an accident near Koblenz in Germany where his R93 chambered in .300 Weatherby Magnumexploded. Huf sustained injury to his thumb, jaw and zygomatic bone. He claimed to have used Weatherby factory ammunition only.[22] An investigation by the German DEVA institute concluded that handloaded .300 Weatherby Magnum ammunition had been used that greatly exceeded the maximum safe gas pressure for the round.[23]

In July 2009, Spaniard Jesus Nieto had an accident near Madrid in Spain where his R93 rifle chambered for 7mm Remington Magnum exploded, causing the bolt carrier to hit and damage his maxilar bone. The accident was determined by the shooter to be due to faulty ammunition leaving a fired bullet stuck in the barrel, causing an explosion on the subsequent shot. The shooter stated that he had used Remington Safari Grade commercial ammunition.[21]

In July 2014, 69-year-old Christer Svensson experienced an accident where his R93 chambered for .30-06 Springfield exploded while loading his rifle on a shooting range near Bollnäs in Sweden, resulting in the bolt hitting his face.[24] Svensson was using Norma factory ammunition. He turned in the rifle to Blaser, but wanted the Swedish National Forensic Centre to investigate the matter. However, he later agreed to the wish of Blaser and its Swedish distributors that all technical investigation would be performed by the German DEVA institute. The DEVA report concluded that the damages to the firearm almost certainly came from a combination of an overpressure and a problem with the casing of the cartridge.[25] Svensson told the Swedish hunting and firearms magazine Svensk Jakt that he had difficulties getting his firearm back from the testing, and that it had been modified when he finally received it. He stated that the chamber and bolt head had been chopped off, and that the barrel did not have a stamped serial number anymore, and claimed the serial number appeared to have been reapplied by hand. He also claimed his rifle originally had a front sight mounted to it which was missing on the returned barrel.

In August 2014, Svensk Jakt wrote that another Swede, Tony Kristoffersson, had experienced an explosion with his R93 while on a Beaver hunt the same year. He described that his rifle had made a clicking sound as if it had failed to fire, but exploded when he tried to pull the bolt back, which resulted in the bolt hitting his hand.[25] The Swedish Blaser distributor later stated that while it is possible to pull the trigger without the bolt being fully locked into battery, the firing pin is designed such that it will not hit the primer with sufficient force to ignite the cartridge.
 
I see the above is from wikipedia but condensing this down we have:
case 1 no details and a citation needed
case 2, handloaded ammunition used
case 3 handloaded ammunition used with a false claim that it was factory
Case 4 faulty factory ammunition causing a bore obstruction and then the next shot causing a catastrophic failure
case 5 inconclusive
case 6 insufficient details, I have had the "Blaser click" once when I reloaded some Privi 7x57, only with these cases and it was solved by sizing the brass a bit more but there was no indent on the primer so the firing pin never touched it. That begs the question what caused the round to fire if the firing pin hadn't struck the primer? A faulty primer itself that was sufficiently sensitised by the action of chambering and unloading perhaps?
 
I see the above is from wikipedia but condensing this down we have:
case 1 no details and a citation needed
case 2, handloaded ammunition used
case 3 handloaded ammunition used with a false claim that it was factory
Case 4 faulty factory ammunition causing a bore obstruction and then the next shot causing a catastrophic failure
case 5 inconclusive
case 6 insufficient details, I have had the "Blaser click" once when I reloaded some Privi 7x57, only with these cases and it was solved by sizing the brass a bit more but there was no indent on the primer so the firing pin never touched it. That begs the question what caused the round to fire if the firing pin hadn't struck the primer? A faulty primer itself that was sufficiently sensitised by the action of chambering and unloading perhaps?
yes from wiki. interestingly the R8 wiki page has nothing about incidents.

I agree that it seems that the majority of reported problems with the R93 was to do with handloads.
 
Given the number of R93 rifles sold in Europe (I believe Blaser is the number one selling brand in Europe, definitely top 5 at least) this seems like a reasonable failure rate…I can’t imagine any other manufacturers being much better.

Also worth bearing in mind that the R8 has a stronger lockup.
 
Back
Top