long_range_rob
Well-Known Member
I love my 7mm08 100-140gn HomePods that are gentle on the shoulder but not on the quarry.
I’m really not trying to swing your decision making one way or the other I promise but one of the side benefits I have found with reloading is that because I have the ability to effectively “store” (in the form of powder, primers and bullets etc.) more ammo than my license or storage may allow, I have found myself practicing for more than I used to when factory ammo was a pain to drive and procure. Dunno if that helps or not but it’s a benefit I hadn’t considered but has helped my shooting immensely.That is part of what I've been thinking. Will the amount of use I may give them warrant homeloading outlay.
This is where my head has been at today. Thinking of I home load, I can store all the components and spend more time shooting paper and steel, as well as all the quarry species I'd be shooting. Heavily leaning towards home loads and the 7mm-08.I’m really not trying to swing your decision making one way or the other I promise but one of the side benefits I have found with reloading is that because I have the ability to effectively “store” (in the form of powder, primers and bullets etc.) more ammo than my license or storage may allow, I have found myself practicing for more than I used to when factory ammo was a pain to drive and procure. Dunno if that helps or not but it’s a benefit I hadn’t considered but has helped my shooting immensely.
So, theoretically, can a longer 7mm bullet, like the 7mm PRC or creedmoor be loaded into the 7mm-08 case and shot through the rifle, if it had a 1:8 or 1:8.5 twist?Most 7-08s are on a 1 in 10” twist rate which means that they cannot use super sexy long sleek bullets that are all the rage.
7x57s on the other hand are perfectly able to use long for calibre bullets as they were originally designed to do so and most have 1 in 8 or 8.5” twist.
The 6.5x55 being another old cartridge, again designed for long bullets, and 6.5 CM copies this.
308 is also very popular and whilst 7-08 may be better on paper its only marginally so.
7-08, pretty much like anything other than 223, 243, 6.5 cm, 308 or 270 is really a handloaders cartridge. Mind you given the price of ammo, difficulty of getting hold of it etc, reloading does allow you to buy a few hundred bullets of your choosing, plus powder and primers to match and then you load them up as you need.
I agree, the 6.5 creedmoor has the advantage due to ammunition available and choice, even if the 7mm-08 seems to be the better calibre for usual UK hunting distances. But saying that, I've checked the 3 gun shops within 45 min drive of me and they have 6.5 creedmoor bullets available (no 7mm-08) but not a big selection, so I'd likely end up home loading them, so may as well get the 7mm-08 and home laod that. But my variation went in this week and I added the 7mm-08 AND the 6.5CM! The 7mm-08 will cover me for boar which is why I favour it. If the 6.5 creedmoor would be "allowed" for boar then my choice would have been even easier and I'd just have gone for the 6.5CM!!7mm-08 Rem and 260 Rem are both good rounds, but poor marketing by Remington has resulted in neither meeting their potential. I looked into buying a 7mm-08 in 1999 and actually bought a 260 Rem. Hornady have done a much better job in marketing their ammunition. I'm seriously looking at changing from 260 Rem to 6.5 Creedmoor when the latest 260 Rem barrel stops performing. All three rounds do the same job, but in the current world, availability of factory non-lead ammunition trumps everything in my book.
Regards
JCS
Is that reason the size of the bullet or the ballistics?This is totally valid and a large part of the reason I got into reloading, I actually got into it so that I could shoot the likes of the 25-06 and 7x57R among others. Upon starting down that path I realised I could “make” the load I needed in my other rifles by picking the bullet I wanted to use and loading to match it. Most people come at it the other way! This also means that I buy rifles in calibres that I probably won’t sell so don’t have to worry about depreciation.
I agree with Sauer, if you don’t want to have the outlay of reloading gear and can’t be arsed with it then .308 is for you.
Just stay away from the 6.5’s for boar….270 is the normal minimum for a reason.
The size of the bullet as I understand it.Is that reason the size of the bullet or the ballistics?
Ken.
No reason why you should load a long 7mm bullet - eg a 173 grain in a 7-08 case. Provided you don’t fill the case with a very fast powder it will shoot. Whether it a) fits into the magazine b) is jammed into the lands to hard or c) will stabilise in a 1 in 10” twist is another matter entirely.So, theoretically, can a longer 7mm bullet, like the 7mm PRC or creedmoor be loaded into the 7mm-08 case and shot through the rifle, if it had a 1:8 or 1:8.5 twist?
Or would it cause too much pressure in the case? Or force you to reduce the amount of powder?
Boar are tough animals with thick hides, plenty of fat under the skin and then tough muscle and skeleton below that. You need a tough bullet to penetrate through that. Bullet construction is far more important that calibre. On the continent in many countries min for big game is 6.5 with 2,000 joules of energy at 100m. 6.5x55 with a 156gn bullet meets this no problem. Boar are often shot at pretty close range - velocity is often the enemy to penetration hence suggestion to use a 150 in the 270 - a 130 gn lead bullet impacting a piggy at 3,000 fps will fail to penetrate- It will blow up on the shoulder. A 150 at 2700 will punch through.The size of the bullet as I understand it.
It's advised the minimum for boar should be a min calibre of .270 and I also understand it to recommend a 150g minimum too.
The couple I know who shoot Boar, use 7mm-08 but only 100gr Sierra bullets, but also always take head shots. The energy they're producing using a calibre above the "recommended minimum" are easily matched by a 6.5, but it's still the accepted to shoot with a 270 and aboveBoar are tough animals with thick hides, plenty of fat under the skin and then tough muscle and skeleton below that. You need a tough bullet to penetrate through that. Bullet construction is far more important that calibre. On the continent in many countries min for big game is 6.5 with 2,000 joules of energy at 100m. 6.5x55 with a 156gn bullet meets this no problem. Boar are often shot at pretty close range - velocity is often the enemy to penetration hence suggestion to use a 150 in the 270 - a 130 gn lead bullet impacting a piggy at 3,000 fps will fail to penetrate- It will blow up on the shoulder. A 150 at 2700 will punch through.
However with modern monolithics penetration is usually not so much of an issue.
Head shooting Boar in my limited experience is really not advised. The brain is very well protected so your shot placement has to be perfect. Boar are usually shot at night and last thing I would want to do is tackle a wounded boar at night in a forest. Wounded boar don’t potter off and die quietly. They usually get pretty grumpy and attack anything that might try to pursue them. This will include the member of the general public walking their cockapoo in the forest the following morning.The couple I know who shoot Boar, use 7mm-08 but only 100gr Sierra bullets, but also always take head shots. The energy they're producing using a calibre above the "recommended minimum" are easily matched by a 6.5, but it's still the accepted to shoot with a 270 and above
I agree. Placement is everything with any shooting scenarioHead shooting Boar in my limited experience is really not advised. The brain is very well protected so your shot placement has to be perfect. Boar are usually shot at night and last thing I would want to do is tackle a wounded boar at night in a forest. Wounded boar don’t potter off and die quietly. They usually get pretty grumpy and attack anything that might try to pursue them. This will include the member of the general public walking their cockapoo in the forest the following morning.
Admittedly small yearling piglets are a totally different beast to a 200 kg Keiler.
Placement is yes everything. But also once you have experience you will realise that things can and do wrong. Spend time with continental boar hunters and it doesn’t take long before you realise that plenty of the dogs and hunters have been stitched together and that all the hunters and most of the dogs were kevlar lined trousers. The lederhosen, that we all mock, were thick leather breeks designed to protect a hunters legs and groin.I agree. Placement is everything with any shooting scenario
Head shooting Boar in my limited experience is really not advised. The brain is very well protected so your shot placement has to be perfect. Boar are usually shot at night and last thing I would want to do is tackle a wounded boar at night in a forest. Wounded boar don’t potter off and die quietly. They usually get pretty grumpy and attack anything that might try to pursue them. This will include the member of the general public walking their cockapoo in the forest the following morning.
Using a small 100gn bullet gives you no room for error and bugger all ability to sort the mess out when it goes wrong.
Admittedly small yearling piglets are a totally different beast to a 200 kg Keiler.
Have a look at