I've been wondering about the same sort of things. I like the Seeland option, but wonder if they'll be tall enough.
I'm 6'2 or 188cm (your choice) and see the Seeland extend to 175cm. I've heard that for quad sticks to work well you have to stand up pretty straight, not bent over inducing instability.
Any tall Seeland users able to offer any advice?
LJ


Thanks all. My concern is being able to achieve this position:
View attachment 89356
Rather than this:
View attachment 89357
where sight picture/alignment is compromised. The 'hunch' also compromises stability as the shooter becomes another hinge, leading to up-down movement during the shot.
Probably now now just a case of 'try before your buy'. Thanks for the advise ntl.
LJ
I have three sets of sticks. All have their pluses and minuses.
View attachment 89334 Corinium quad sticks (my preferred choice)
View attachment 89335 Limulus quad sticks
View attachment 89336 John Robson (YDS) sticks
I have tried the Viper sticks but found them clunky, noisy (whistling noise when windy) and not as strong as the wooden ones I have however they were well made.
Willie
Those Corinium ones look good. Am I right in saying they are a fixed height though?
Ah ok, thanks. Are they about the same price as the Viperflex?The Corinium Cradle sticks are not adjustable however I think you might be able to purchase different lengths to suit your stature as they are all hand made.
Willie
Ah ok, thanks. Are they about the same price as the Viperflex?
Thanks to everyone for the helpful responses. I am now considering the merits of a trigger stick tripod instead of the quad sticks. I came across these on eBay and wonder if anyone has experience of them, they are not Primos.
View attachment 89607
I had a set of the Hammond sporting viperflex quad sticks, when using them on a windy day on the top of a Cotswold ridge my shooting companion asked me how I could put up with them whistling. I ended up taping them up. After a while I saw the Decoy sticks and handled them, they are certainly a lighter weight build than the Hammond ones, but they are still sturdy enough to walk with. I have also found the Decoy sticks to be better padded to stop any clattering when using them to walk with. A pair rest in my hall now, having been put into semi-retirement by a set of Bog-Pod tripod sticks.
Why tripod sticks? Because quad sticks in thick cover are a swine to move quietly. I completely missed a couple of chances at deer because of the faff of moving the quad sticks, both times the guys with me told me to follow their example and to use a tripod set up.
So if you mainly walk field margins and crops then use the quad sticks, whichever brand you choose or even make, but if you are going to be sat in thick cover with deer liable to appear over a very wide arc then consider a set of tripods.
I have both and find myself taking out the Bog-Pods almost all the time. But I do like the Seeland Decoy quad sticks.
Simon