Pistol for humane dispatch

Status
Not open for further replies.
Sorry i'd like to find you a film of it , but I thought side ways was more useful and moving with a pistol hitting the moving targets was :shock: Remember this started as we were told you not could hit a deer at a yard let alone shoot while moving ,have you ever used or had the chance to use a pistol or do what is in the vid ?
I am done now as there is no use trying to defend pistols to folk without a clue what can be achieved with one . MS is correct . and the film was all made up in the cutting room , pistols are crap and it has been proved ? the fact that you can find them while magnet fishing means they are of no use and need to be discarded from English history .

:zzz:

Yes,I do have a few revolvers and semis in .357/.38,.32,.22,.410 and probably shot more animals than you can imagine but never done any of the target stuff your an expert at and that's why i was so interested in your comments.
I still believe your sport is nothing like shooting a 2inch brain with a heavy enough load(wadcutters often arent enough),completely different discipline.I have around 40 years experience of dispatching animals with pistols and 2-3meters is plenty far enough in my experience,and dare i say it,i feel a.410 is far more effective at those ranges.
 
Ok this thread is going beyond the point now.

I would add that I know Paul'o and he has stalked with me a few times, plus I know for a fact he has helped a lot of people out on this site without asking for anything in return.

Again people should be careful about judging people on any forum/web, its easy for those to sit behind a screen and belittle another without knowing who they are or their back ground. Its an easy trap to fall into, and in some instances you will find yourself looking a fool if not careful.

I think this may have happened, but I will leave those who posted to judge for themselves.

Totally agreed,it turns out 2inches at 100m is as “incredible” as i thought!!
 
I did't disagree with the use of a S/G ? I two have shot many living things with pistols rifles and used to own a 410 pistol for HD still got an old folding 410 for farm use in the pens , I got rid of my 38sp wheel HD pistol as it was't getting the use as I use a shot gun my point was pistols in the right hands have a use and are not useless for despatching at close range . use the correct bullets not fmj I used 110 gr
HP or 148 wadcutters flat nose lead slugs both worked very well


Yes,I do have a few revolvers and semis in .357/.38,.32,.22,.410 and probably shot more animals than you can imagine but never done any of the target stuff your an expert at and that's why i was so interested in your comments.
I still believe your sport is nothing like shooting a 2inch brain with a heavy enough load(wadcutters often arent enough),completely different discipline.I have around 40 years experience of dispatching animals with pistols and 2-3meters is plenty far enough in my experience,and dare i say it,i feel a.410 is far more effective at those ranges.
 
I did't disagree with the use of a S/G ? I two have shot many living things with pistols rifles and used to own a 410 pistol for HD still got an old folding 410 for farm use in the pens , I got rid of my 38sp wheel HD pistol as it was't getting the use as I use a shot gun my point was pistols in the right hands have a use and are not useless for despatching at close range . use the correct bullets not fmj I used 110 gr
HP or 148 wadcutters flat nose lead slugs both worked very well

Good man.
 
Love to see people at the top of their game

I find it inspirational

My 1911 long barreled pistol won't do that but then it has a muppet driving it
 
Last edited:
yeh sure it will just needs a bit a love new trigger bow nastoff hammer and trigger sear and main spring kit bend the extractor in the side a tad a light polish to the slide rails do away two part recoil spring assy it will run like a train , loved my Dillon SVI 9x25 and 1911 wide from Para ORD 38 supers the stock 1911 chopped and ported 45acp was a dream in close :D
Love to see people at the top of their game

I find it inspirational

My 1911 won't do that but then it has a muppet driving it
 
yeh sure it will just needs a bit a love new trigger bow nastoff hammer and trigger sear and main spring kit bend the extractor in the side a tad a light polish to the slide rails do away two part recoil spring assy it will run like a train , loved my Dillon SVI 9x25 and 1911 wide from Para ORD 38 supers the stock 1911 chopped and ported 45acp was a dream in close :D


Plus mine being only a .22LR thanks to our beloved Gov

Having said that I've seen some amazing shooting with the humble old .22LR
 
haha ok just give it to a miller get the slide lightened and a slick rail polish it will run better reduce the recoil spring by a coil it may just be to strong to let it run fast the . had a Vostok .22
turned it into a fun steel ringer on steel targets
you tube again to the rescue again it will be on there as a how to slick up a .22 1911
 
Totally agreed,it turns out 2inches at 100m is as “incredible” as i thought!!

If you can be arsed theres a video on U tube of a fella shooting a golf ball at 100 yards with a .22

Theres another of a fella shooting a balloon at 1000 yards with a .45 pistol
 
If you can be arsed theres a video on U tube of a fella shooting a golf ball at 100 yards with a .22

Theres another of a fella shooting a balloon at 1000 yards with a .45 pistol

There's lots of stuff like that on there like people shooting basketballs over house roofs etc, but they never seem to mention how many hours of filming it took to get it, and they can only ever seem to do it once? Hmmm?:???:
Do you honestly think the bloke hitting the can at 100m did that in one go? Everyone gets lucky now and again, but unless you can be consistent, then it is not reliable.
Me and my brother spent hours shooting at a matchbox in a long shed once with a Webley junior. Our Dad came in and said 'here, give me a go'! He hit it first time!:roll: Funnily enough he wouldn't attempt it again as he said it was too easy! We spent years in awe of that shot, until he finally admitted that it was a complete fluke. :lol:
MS
 
Practice practice practice its all just practice even skinning or shooting a deer drop dead no dog needed takes practice, clay shooters practice golf ball whackers practice swimmers yeh your getting it by now practice :rofl:
 
I've always known I'm not the brightest match in the box but for all that I will confidently inform you this site is saving the Home Office shed loads of Taxpayers money!

The site owners should wise-up and get a monthly invoice to them for Firearms Licensing Officer training and policy development.

K
 
...the angle is perfect for an extreme ricochet ...

What's an extreme ricochet? I've heard of extreme skiing and snowboarding but not an extreme ricochet.

... WILL get with a pistol bullet as opposed to a frangible rifle bullet...MS

So is your argument with using a pistol or not using frangible ammunition? After all, there is far more variety of frangible pistol ammo than rifle.
 
It's amusing how the dispatch pistol threads always bring out so many egos who labour on trying to justify their unhelpful comments. I am of the opinion that if a firearm is available apply for it. The more in circulation the better it is for the sport. Firearms ownership is whittled away by "don't need it" clowns. I made sure I applied for everything I could just to make sure they don'tfade out. It's a shame that so many are restricted to snubby. 38s which are not as easy to shoot accurately as a full size pistol, but of course that is the home office's intention. Keep ownership of firearm types small, it's easy to eradicate, just look at the latest legislative proposals. So pleased I am in a place where I can carry a 10mm with me in the woods and no longer have to worry about having to justify it!
 
What's an extreme ricochet? I've heard of extreme skiing and snowboarding but not an extreme ricochet.



So is your argument with using a pistol or not using frangible ammunition? After all, there is far more variety of frangible pistol ammo than rifle.

Sorry, been away stalking.
An 'extreme ricochet' is one that comes off a solid surface such as a piece of flint or tarmac! It makes that noise that we've heard so many times on the old cowboy films, and when it happens to you for real, it makes your but cheeks clench so tight, that if you had a piece of coal between them at the time, you could probably create a diamond!:D It happens occasionally in Suffolk where somewhere behind a deer with a seemingly perfect backstop, lies a piece of black flint at about 45 degrees! However, if you shoot bullets at roads, you will get this pretty much every time! The trouble with a standard pistol bullet, is that it is fairly low speed, and even if you hit the deer, the bullet retains almost 100% of its mass and a good proportion of its energy depending upon numerous factors such as size of deer, surface type, angle, and whether you even hit it, etc.. This is why the police would rather grant a .177 HMR to a novice rather than a .22 LR despite its higher velocity, as the ricochet risk is negligible in comparison.
The OP used a relatively small soft point bullet, which will still ricochet as it has nowhere else to go. However, he is less likely to miss for a start. The bullet will begin to break up on impact with the deer. Upon exit it will break up further into even smaller pieces when it hits the road worst case. If you can get a frontal shot to the brain with the neck behind, this is perfect as you may not even get an exit with any bullet which would be textbook stuff! This is why a shotgun is the weapon of choice on a hard surface, as the load is already broken up before it is even fired! If you watch slow motion footage of how bullets and shot behave, you will see that shot almost turns into liquid/dust! This video shows it perfectly, and also how bullets seem to turn to liquid when hitting a surface straight on. Fascinating! The lead shot is near the end:

I wasn't aware that you could get frangible bullets for pistols as such? If you can, then that would add a lot of weight to using one for HD as it at least shows recognition of risk and how to minimise it. Once again though, at sensible HD range, a .410 pistol using standard No.6 shot at about 11-16 grains will have the same effect on a deer as a solid slug, but without the risk of 'extreme ricochet'! If anything, it is even more effective as it spreads slightly and then disperses at various angles to destroy a larger section of the head. Shotguns up close are devastating!
I'm interested to hear about frangible bullets? I know they have been designed for use inside passenger planes without the risk of cabin rupture. Maybe this is the answer?
As I've said previously, I have no issue with pistols. It is just their effectiveness and safety, along with those that desire to own them for the benefit of themselves, rather than the welfare of deer.
Firing at any hard surface, even at 90 degrees is foolish!

MS
 
Last edited:
I wasn't aware that you could get frangible bullets for pistols as such?

What? Glaser Safety Slugs were early ones available in the 1970s. Simply its a bullet jacket of required calibre, put into a swage die to shape it after being filled with #7 1/2 shot and a frangible plastic cap placed on top. The swage is then done and emerges one Glaser Safety Slug. You could make you own MS with a simple forming die and top and bottom punch. Even an old Wamadet or vintage CH set would likely do.
 
What? Glaser Safety Slugs were early ones available in the 1970s. Simply its a bullet jacket of required calibre, put into a swage die to shape it after being filled with #7 1/2 shot and a frangible plastic cap placed on top. The swage is then done and emerges one Glaser Safety Slug. You could make you own MS with a simple forming die and top and bottom punch. Even an old Wamadet or vintage CH set would likely do.

I've no real idea what you just said there entirely, but it sounds a lot more effective and safe than a solid lump of lead! Maybe, after much pi55 and wind on this thread, we have just identified an acceptably safe and realistic reason to carry a pistol in the eyes of those would deny it?:shock:
 
I think one problem that the OP may face is that he has owned pistols before the handgun ban yet appears, from reading his post, not to have had any of them at that time conditioned for humane dispatch. That may of course be that he didn't shoot deer before 1996 or that he is now shooting deer over different ground than before. So here is why there may be a problem I can only speak from what I've encountered. It refers in general terms that may or may not be relevant to the OP.

Prior to stopping shooting over the relevant land I had, in the early 1990s, a .357 Magnum Smith & Wesson Model revolver on my FAC for not only target shooting but also specifically conditioned for shooting feral goats over that named land and that named land only and only for shooting feral goats. This was before people realised that they could get an income from continentals paying money to shoot these things.

So at a time they were regarded as competing with the resident roe and red deer for food. Zo they were considered as vermin. As indeed roe deer once were. But and this is the thing that's coming back to the OP's post. I never ever had the thing conditioned also for humane dispatch. I didn't want it for other than that. Not for deer, nor caged trapped or snared foxes or feral cats but just target shooting and shooting of feral goats. And never took the thing out when stalking deer on the hill. It weighed over two pounds.

So many police forces will have no problem with a newcomer who has entered the sport after the handgun ban requesting a humane dispatch pistol.But what they will have is an "issue" shall we say with someone who owned pistols before the handgun ban that were conditioned then only for target shooting but not for humane dispatch. The question will directly be if the applicant needs it why didn't they have it so conditioned on their FAC when they owned pistols before the handgun ban?

So I won't debate if a pistol (and for that I mean pistols and revolvers) is needed or not or if it is just affectation at best and "one upmanship" at worst as that is down to an individual's circumstance or conscience. But certainly if you stalked deer before the handgun ban and at that time had pistols on your FAC that were only for target shooting but not conditioned for humane dispatch the first question (even though its twenty years since the handgun ban) will by why is the applicant asking for it now when they never ever did ask for such back then?


Its quite straight forward. I only took up deer stalking from 2013 onwards.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top