Pellet Pinger
Well-Known Member
Agree, great shooting but beg to differ on the clarity.That's unreal clarity for a scope that price, great shooting too.
This is nearly 3 years old.
Agree, great shooting but beg to differ on the clarity.That's unreal clarity for a scope that price, great shooting too.
Well I reckon this is a record braking thread,
I am still very pleased with the c50 I really have put it to the test, and to my total surprise the ir that came with it has been more than sufficient,
The dusk mode is **** hot.
For me as a work tool its a must, versatile.
Today I used the new model sidewinder i brought and I rather the c50.
My only issue is that the battery's don't last the time pulsar reckon
Oh and the mic is very sensitive you can't fart while filming, or when I and filming a YouTube video and my old man is swearing his head off good f ING shot boy.
That said you can hear the impact of my air rifle hitting at 50 yards.
But it is nice to hear the impact on the rat thats quality.Speaker is very sensitive in comparison to the Thermions , I’m going to test blocking two of the side cap holes on a spare cap I have and check the results , the C50 speaker holes are larger than the Thermion models .
Agree, great shooting but beg to differ on the clarity.
This is nearly 3 years old.
Too be honest anything works beautifully at 15 yards , even so a great video.I am a great believer of personal choice chap if it works for you stick with it and enjoy.
Absolutely bud, couldn’t agree more.I am a great believer of personal choice chap if it works for you stick with it and enjoy.
Too be honest anything works beautifully at 15 yards , even so a great![]()
That rat shooting was at 30 yards and a few at 20.Too be honest anything works beautifully at 15 yards , even so a great video.![]()
I was referring to pellet pingerThat rat shooting was at 30 yards and a few at 20.
All the best mate![]()
No worries mate I just added it because it's difficult to judge range from a videoI was referring to pellet pinger
Hence my like, although give me some credit, it was nearer 20ydsI was referring to pellet pinger
Certainly no offense taken, I completely get what you are saying, I’ll be the first to say I haven’t looked through one yet and fully accept comments about not being in a position to comment, as I’ve already said I never normally bother with threads like this because I’m at one with my gear and have faith in it.If I may take a min.
to mr pellet pinger please do not take offence as it really is not my intention to put your video down , in fact quite the opposite. I’m actually a big fan .
i think a lot of people tend to forget that optics will always be a subjective opinion.
so on the subject of clarity, image detail and general veiwing by the intended audience we need to keep in mind that the captured image/video is how the operator sees it .
a simple example could be … if your looking at a rabbit say 200m away through your brand new Swarovski binos and the image detail is sublime. You then pass them to your mate who in turn looks at the same rabbit, there is a very good chance that your have to adjust the focus , even though it’s a minimal amount, you just have to tweak it just a tad .
night vision has exactly the same problem, we are looking at what the operator is seeing as perfect , to us the first thing we should be thinking if the image is not quite as good as it could be is the old bugger needs to go to specsaversmaybe
and so my point is when we look at each other’s videos there’s only so much I feel we can take from them , I also feel this is why we hear so very often “ it’s looks so much better in the viewfinder “
to be honest I just like the different inputs. I believe we can all take something from them ,becouse there’s not one of us that are as good as we think we are .
Download to your PC with the cable Dave . Then upload .Well I dont know why but the videos I down load are shiiity , and not worth a toss
but the scope works grand this one at 150 , came into the vixen call tonight View attachment 241284