Hi Ade, it is driven by the landowner's requirement which in turn is driven by his game dealer announcing that soon he will only accept beasts shot with non lead.Longshot, whilst not wishing to tread on your thread (far from it - each to their own) I am interested to learn the reasons people are moving to non-lead.
May I ask why you are looking for non-toxic? (BTW I do take issue with the term "non-toxic", copper for example can be extremely toxic. "Non-lead" is probably a more sensible description)
Like I say, I am interested as to why. Is it due to landowners requirements, preparation for something that is yet to happen, a desire for no lead fragments in what you eat or a search
for greater accuracy ? (OK the last one was tongue in cheek)
Ade![]()
I want to move from lead to non toxic bullets for the 223 I use for roe in Scotland. Does anyone know if deer legal, non toxic factory ammunition in 223 is available in UK?
Many landowners, in particular forest owners, are in some stewardship and certification schemes. They have to meet many different requirements to be in such schemes and for many use of lead free ammunition for shooting and wildlife management is a requirement.Longshot, whilst not wishing to tread on your thread (far from it - each to their own) I am interested to learn the reasons people are moving to non-lead.
May I ask why you are looking for non-toxic? (BTW I do take issue with the term "non-toxic", copper for example can be extremely toxic. "Non-lead" is probably a more sensible description)
Like I say, I am interested as to why. Is it due to landowners requirements, preparation for something that is yet to happen, a desire for no lead fragments in what you eat or a search
for greater accuracy ? (OK the last one was tongue in cheek)
Ade![]()
My recollection is that copper is toxic to trees (hence the old trick knocking copper nails into a tree to kill it). Perhaps the Forestry Commission is shooting itself in the foot in respect of copper ricochets hitting their trees.Many landowners, in particular forest owners, are in some stewardship and certification schemes. They have to meet many different requirements to be in such schemes and for many use of lead free ammunition for shooting and wildlife management is a requirement.
For example about 60 to 70% of UK forestry is grown to the internationally recognised FSC Standard so any end product using that timber can carry the FSC Logo. There are new standards coming into force in 2023 regarding forest management and its effect on the environment. One little part is use of non toxic ammunition for all shooting activities on land which is within the scheme.
And consumers are increasingly aware of venison and game and there is a growing demand. But consumers and those selling venison want it as clean and healthy as possible. This is driving game dealers to ensure lead free supply chain.
There has also lots of coverage about availability of lead free venison and game. Most consumers and buyers would choose lead free if given the choice.
Hi Longshot. I understand your reasoning now. Your clarification is appreciated.Hi Ade, it is driven by the landowner's requirement which in turn is driven by his game dealer announcing that soon he will only accept beasts shot with non lead.
Err....Water is toxic if you drink too much , lets end this farce that copper is no better than lead regards bullets for killing out venison as its utter rubbish and makes are community appear stupid !
How many people are you aware of that have ended up in hospital with lead poisoning from stripping staircases ect?Removing old lead containing paint from a single old staircase can put you in hospital, i have yet to hear bad things about copper and the copper smiths and plumbers i know .
spent a while doing ironwork staircase rails for folks , quite a few actually, one had three warnings regards method and PPE . Lead workers have mandatory lead blood tests now, show high levels and you dont work , BTW its the same with Zinc in Galvanizing plants . Not aware of ant such testing of those working with copper though !Err....
How many people are you aware of that have ended up in hospital with lead poisoning from stripping staircases ect?
Likewise how many plumbers using lead for jointing?
And the real elephant, how many instances of lead poisoning from eating lead shot meat or poultry?
Well if I was a forestry manager and any stalking said he wasn’t going to use copper because of risk of hitting trees I would sack him on the spot.My recollection is that copper is toxic to trees (hence the old trick knocking copper nails into a tree to kill it). Perhaps the Forestry Commission is shooting itself in the foot in respect of copper ricochets hitting their trees.
You really need to do a little research for yourself. There is plenty of evidence that demonstrates that injested lead is bioavailable. And plenty of evidence showing that long term exposure to lead causes all sorts of problems. Just have a read of the warnings on a box of ammo.Err....
How many people are you aware of that have ended up in hospital with lead poisoning from stripping staircases ect?
Likewise how many plumbers using lead for jointing?
And the real elephant, how many instances of lead poisoning from eating lead shot meat or poultry?
Longshot, whilst not wishing to tread on your thread (far from it - each to their own) I am interested to learn the reasons people are moving to non-lead.
May I ask why you are looking for non-toxic? (BTW I do take issue with the term "non-toxic", copper for example can be extremely toxic. "Non-lead" is probably a more sensible description)
Like I say, I am interested as to why. Is it due to landowners requirements, preparation for something that is yet to happen, a desire for no lead fragments in what you eat or a search
for greater accuracy ? (OK the last one was tongue in cheek)
Ade![]()
spent a while doing ironwork staircase rails for folks , quite a few actually, one had three warnings regards method and PPE . Lead workers have mandatory lead blood tests now, show high levels and you dont work ,
With respect, that is not the answers to the questions I asked.You really need to do a little research for yourself. There is plenty of evidence that demonstrates that injested lead is bioavailable. And plenty of evidence showing that long term exposure to lead causes all sorts of problems. Just have a read of the warnings on a box of ammo.
Try moving shot placement a little further forward. Half way up and in line with the front of leg, rather than more traditional 1/3 up and in line with rear of leg.Using Lapua Naturalis 50 gr in 1:12 for roe. Not precision like V-max but good enough. Hit animals run a bit so a dog on standby is recommended.