In over 30 years fishing for salmon, sea trout, carp, trout and anything else I have been asked to show my license twice.
I had a syndicate rod on the Welsh dee some years ago, and the man in charge would constantly milk the salmon for the local hatchery, who would in turn re stock the river with thousands of smolts. Small scale I know, but the EA or NRW didn't want to know or contribute sadly.
The Environment Agency’s own reports show most rivers fail to meet good ecological status. Sewage discharges, agricultural runoff, microplastics, invasive species, and habitat destruction are combining into a perfect storm. And enforcement? Often non-existent.
I recall a Ceredigion salmon poacher had a £1 fine after making £61,000 from poached salmon.
You also have the privatization of water companies and their ongoing failure to invest in infrastructure choosing instead to hand out dividends while allowing sewage overflows has drawn increasing public ire.
There's a deep cultural divide in angling between the "sport for sport's sake" crowd and the "catch it, eat it" approach. In Britain, the former has long been dominant, especially in coarse fishing. This is partially a product of tradition, partially of conservation, and partially if we’re honest a snobbery about what “respectable” angling looks like. Do you remember when Hugh Fernley chapped that grayling on the head, and anglers calling for him to be sacked!
In some parts of Europe, eating coarse fish is normal. In Britain, it’s a near-taboo. Pike, perch, zander these are good eating fish, but taking them home can make you persona non grata on many waters. It’s bizarre when you step back and look at it rationally. You’re entirely correct: if it’s legal, respectful of the ecosystem, and sustainable, why should it be vilified?
The signal crayfish problem is also another taboo and are well known destructive, invasive pest but the bureaucracy around dealing with them makes no sense.
If you catch one, the EA advise you to stamp on their head. You’d think DEFRA and the EA would be handing out traps and permits at the bus stop, but no, you need permission from multiple landowners, and even then it’s often impossible to comply fully.
What makes it worse is that removing them for food a perfectly viable way to both enjoy wild food and reduce the population is actively discouraged by over-regulation. Yes, there are biosecurity risks, but with proper oversight, community trapping could be part of the solution.
The Angling Trust (who sometimes get it right, sometimes not), and local river trusts. But the whole system needs a massive shake-up.
Whether you’re fishing for food, fun, or solitude, you should be able to do it without wading through rubbish, legal minefields, and cultural elitism.