Short stalking rifle calibre.

RPA used to sell a 308 Stalking rifle with a 16” barrel. It was accurate and well thought of.

I personally have a 51cm barrel in 308, and similar length 6.5x55 barrel for my Mauser MO3, and there’s nothing to choose between them in woodland stalking.

However, regardless of what it says on the boxes, my real world tests have shown that the 308 shooting a 150 grain bullet with a zero of 150m will drop around 8cm between zero and 200m, and drop 22cm from zero at 250m.

The 6.5x55 shooting a 123 grain bullet zeroed at 150m will drop 6cm at 200m, and drop 16cm at 250m.

But note the different bullet weights.
I like both of them, and I homeload. If I wanted to stay ‘factory’ then the 308 would be my choice as there’s so much ammo available.
 
Whatever you get, learn to shoot it with lots of practice, off sticks. The 6.5’s are light recoil do you can see the strike and you’ll have plenty of choice to find ammo that your gun likes. I shoot 6.5x55, but all the 6.5 are good at killing deer. I also use an 18” barrelled .308. Get a rifle that fits and a comfortable sling, sticks you can deploy without thinking, a scope you can see a deer in cover through and spend time in the field with someone who knows the ground and can the demonstrate field craft you will need. Then you can enjoy! And avoid spending the kind of money I spent by obsessing over the kit that makes marginal difference compared with the above.
 
For walking with when stalking, a Blaser Attaché or
K95 in up to 7mm-08 or below would fit the bill, been using one of the former since 1995, still going strong, and a pleasure to walk with rather than a pain to lug around. The ‘Flat shooting’ bit is a non-issue, IME, and in any case a rifle with an 18” barrel will not be so flat shooting as one with a 26” barrel. That said, if you zero to shoot one inch high at 100m you’ll not have to change point of aim out to 200m.

View attachment 461924
It’s nearly all walking here, and it’s not flat!
ive a sako in 7-08 love the calibre but theres very little between that and my .308
 
16 inch Tikka tactical in .308 will hit a 10cm circle at 600 yards with 8/10 shots using Sako 165 grain copper. 18 inches will be a bit better velocity wise. You do have to know your scope settings for warm and cold weather and read the wind well. However for deer I would think a maximum of 300 yards.
 
I've spoken to a few friends aswell and they mentioned something called "minute of deer" they said as long as the rifle groups within the kill zone from 50 to 150 (maybe 200 depending on calibre) then that's all you need in regards to "flat shooting"
It's called Maximum Point Blank Range (MPBR).
The distance over which you can shoot without allowing any hold-over or hold-under, and still place you bullet in the 4" (for deer) kill zone.
For example, with my .270 I can simply "point and press" on any deer from 30 yards to 230 yards.

I think it's a good way of zeroing.
 
It's called Maximum Point Blank Range (MPBR).
The distance over which you can shoot without allowing any hold-over or hold-under, and still place you bullet in the 4" (for deer) kill zone.
For example, with my .270 I can simply "point and press" on any deer from 30 yards to 230 yards.

I think it's a good way of zeroing.
Same with my 6.5x55, zero’d spot on at 100 and minute of deer to c.200, although it’s rare I can’t get closer.
 
It's called Maximum Point Blank Range (MPBR).
The distance over which you can shoot without allowing any hold-over or hold-under, and still place you bullet in the 4" (for deer) kill zone.
For example, with my .270 I can simply "point and press" on any deer from 30 yards to 230 yards.

I think it's a good way of zeroing.
AHH ok, and is there a way to work out the MPBR for specific calibres at barrel lengths?

Or as mentioned by someone else Im worrying way too much. I will mostly be shooting from 75 to 150 which all the mentioned calibres will be in the MPBR by the sounds of it.
 
I honestly can't remember when I last shot a deer at more than 65-yards but when it comes to retaining a sight picture post shot you're gonna struggle with an 18" barrel even if in that oh so feminine chambering that is said to be the 243.

Does this help? Probably not!

K
 
I honestly can't remember when I last shot a deer at more than 65-yards but when it comes to retaining a sight picture post shot you're gonna struggle with an 18" barrel even if in that oh so feminine chambering that is said to be the 243.

Does this help? Probably not!

K

Moderated will make it a little bit softer for your ears, eyes and shoulder!
 
Hi all, I've been reading through tons of posts and haven't really found what I'm looking for...
I'm new to stalking, been a few times and used and estate rifle but am looking to put in for a variation so I can get my own.
It seems .270 .. 6.5CR .. .308 are the most common (from the dozens of posts I've read) but what I would like is a compact/short/light rifle as don't spend time in a high seat, I'm walking for hours.
I like the idea of the flat shooting, low recoil 6.5 but how short can you go in the barrel?
I've seen plenty of posts about 18 or even 16inch 308 but then you have the loopy trajectory which is like the avoid.
Then there's the 270 which I have been using and although I'm not fussed about a bit of recoil as I've only taken 4 shots max on a day, it would be nice to keep the animal in the scope once I've pulled the trigger.

So any advice on calibre / barrel length / make and model suggestions based on the above?

Thanks

Welcome to the world of ballistics, and everybody will give you their own view. But look at the physics first. Velocity at the Muzzle is a function of the force on the bullet over a period of time and length of the barrel. Force provides the accelaration, and accelaration over a period of time gives the muzzle velocity. The period of time is determined by the barrel length and how quickly the bullet accelerates. A longer barrel gives more time for the bullet to accelarate - all other things being equal. So any rifle, using the same ammunition will have a higher muzzle velocity with a longer barrel than a shorter one. In the same cartridge lighter bullets tend to accerate faster than heavier ones..

The force is produced by pressure from the powder burning. Typically pressures in most centrefire deer legal cartridges are about 60,000 pounds per square inch (give or take a few thousand. The pressure is acting on the base of the bullet - this a function of the base area which is Pi x Radius squared. Thus a .243 has a base area of .0.059xPi sq in, whereas a .308 is 0.094xPi sq in. So in a 308 there is more force on the base of the bullet compared to the 243. You also need to take into account the friction of the bullet against the walls of the barrel and this to is a function of the radius of the bore x length of the contact area of the bullet with the bore. Light for calibre bullets will be shorter than heavier for calibre bullets, and thus velocities tend be higher.

Finally you need to consider the powder burn rate. To maximise velocity you need choose a powder which will have a burn rate so that it continues to have positive pressure on the base of the bullet rigth to the end of the barrel, at which point the powder is pretty much used up. Most factory ammunition, and most reloading manuals are based on 22 to 26" barrel lengths, with any thing shorter, the powder used burns too slowly to be completely burnt before the bullet leaves the muzzle ( hence why short barrels are bloody noisy and have huge muzzle flash).

So all things being equal, a bigger bore diameter is easier to get higher velocities than smaller bores, or from cartridges with a large volume of powder. There is a very good reason why likes of 22-250s, 243s, 270s, 300 win mags etc tended to have 24 to 26" barrels. You choose those cartridges because you want velocity for flat shooting.

If you want fast shooting out of a short barrel then a larger bore diameter with light for calibre bullets will get the initial velocity. If you take the 308 based family of cartridges, they all use pretty much the same weight of powder. A 243 will spit out a 100gn bullet at about 3,000 fps, but a 308 can send a 120gn bullet at about 3,100 fps given similar length of barrels.

So if you want a shorter barrel then a larger diameter bore is a good thing.

But, and this very big but, the handiness of a rifle is much much more that barrel length, stock length etc. It is all about weight of barrel, and the stock and how it balances and feels. Last year at the stalking show I picked up a Bergara B13 single shot with 14" thick chunky barrel. This combined with a heavy stainless action and very light synthetic stock made a rifle with all the ergomics of a dumpbell. Contrast that to carrying a fine well balanced shotgun with 28 or 30" barrels - the same overall length as a typical rifle with 24" barrel.

I would go for a normal sporter weight barrel of 20 to 22" long and fit it with a lighweight over barrel moderator that doesn't extend more 4" from the muzzle.

The other real issue with most rifles is the position of the front sling stud on the stock. If you want a nicely balanced rifle for carrying over the shoulder, then use a barrel band on the barrel. Every one will now start shouting that this ruins accuracy. It does if you keep it tight when shooting, it doesnt if you keep it nice and loose.

As for flat shooting - in deer stalking distances -say to 250m, velocity is key to flat shooting. Cartridges such as the 6.5 CM shoot long highly aerodynamic bullets, but at moderatye velocity. They retain their velocity very well, but this is on the 1000m target shooting type distances. But inside 250m, a short light 110gn .308 bullet leaving the muzzle at about 3000 fps will shoot flatter than a 140gn at 2600 fps. Downside of short flat bullets - such as the .308 120gn, is that past 250m they start shedding velocity fast, and thus start dropping quickly. A long 308 bullet will fly just as flat as 140gn 6.5 CM over 1,000m, but it needs to weigh 165 to 180 gn, and the 308 case doesnt really have enough powder, so you need to step up to 30-06, 300 magnum tyoe cartridges.

Don't be in a rush to buy the first rifle you see. Get out stalking with friends or guides and use their rifles. See what you like, see what you don't. I always wanted a stutzen. Then I have shot them - horriible noisy, poorly balanced, kicky nasty little things.
 
The flat-shooting reputation of the 6.5cm is something of a misunderstanding when it comes to hunting applications. At stalking ranges it's velocity that wins over efficient bullet design for flatness - the charts below are using "box spec" for two factory loads. See the 308 with a heavier bullet and worse BC is actually flatter, although there's little in it.
However, 308 is famously tolerant of a shorter barrell and will/might lose a bit less velocity than the 6.5.
View attachment 461889
Not sure that’s a fair comparison, that speed is probably where they found best accuracy for the 120 gr TTSX. The creedmoor can run a 100 gr TTSX which has a slightly higher G1 BC than the 130 .308 at .359 at 3250-3300 fps from a 24” barrel so will be flatter again.

I’ve shot creedmoor and .308 for years, creedmoor is definitely flatter, unless handicapped by a short barrel turning it into a Grendel.
 
MPBR calculator

Very helpful, I’ve seen it before but forgot to ask then, what is the “G” number, “drag function”? Aplogies if its something obvious and I’m being stupid. The concept is very sound like a military “battle sight” setting defaulting at 300m.
 
Back
Top