10.36 A variation is always necessary if a certificate holder wishes to change one of the firearms, even if they wish to purchase one identical to the one they are selling (Wilson v Coombe, Queen’s Bench Divisional Court, July 1988). “One for one” variation refers to firearms that are authorised to be acquired following the disposal of a firearm or a request to change an existing authority to acquire. There is no set time in which the certificate holder must apply for a replacement authority once their firearm is disposed of. The keeping of open authorities indefinitely should be discouraged, subject to a collector seeking particular firearms. Applications for “one for one” variations should be made by the certificate holder submitting their firearm certificate together with a completed Form 201V to the police firearms licensing department. Such variations are processed free of charge. In most cases, it will not be necessary to re-examine the applicant’s circumstances. Further enquiries will be necessary, however, if for example the application is for a change of use or for a full-bore firearm when the holder’s shooting club only has facilities for small-bore shooting.7 days if you want it for free, after that in becomes a just another variation that you pay for. I usually put a 1-1 in when I inform them of a sale of a firearm
Nonsense.7 days if you want it for free, after that in becomes a just another variation that you pay for. I usually put a 1-1 in when I inform them of a sale of a firearm
I feel I'm being misquoted here, you have to inform the police within 7 days of the sale of a firearm. If you don't do a 1-1 you will lose the slotNonsense.
See the extract from the guidance above.
You only pay for a variation if you increase the number of firearms (inc moderators) held.
No you won’t, that is not written in the legislation and should not be the case.I feel I'm being misquoted here, you have to inform the police within 7 days of the sale of a firearm. If you don't do a 1-1 you will lose the slot
Then our experiences differ, enjoy the rest of your eveningNo you won’t, that is not written in the legislation and should not be the case.
The slot on your certificate is your authority to posses a type of firearm, just because you dispose of an individual firearm you don’t give up your authority to possess.
See the part in bold in my first post above, “There is no set time in which the certificate holder must apply for a replacement authority once their firearm is disposed of.”
The point being, people should be given correct information, the correct information is contained within the guidance and more importantly the legislation, not the rules some FLDs make up for themselves.Then our experiences differ, enjoy the rest of your evening
Where do these people get there info from??Nonsense.
See the extract from the guidance above.
You only pay for a variation if you increase the number of firearms (inc moderators) held.
That's all good stuff. But the next sentence states, - "The keeping of open authorities indefinitely should be discouraged".See the part in bold in my first post above, “There is no set time in which the certificate holder must apply for a replacement authority once their firearm is disposed of.
Keeping authorities indefinitely is talking about empty slots you are yet to fill, not one for one variations, because if you don’t fulfil them then you probably don’t have good reason in the first place.That's all good stuff. But the next sentence states, - "The keeping of open authorities indefinitely should be discouraged".
Which is why IMHO, different police forces have taken different views the time period between, 0 days and infinite days for a free variation.
@Lloyd90
Being a pragmatic chap, if I anticipate replacing rifle, when I have sold one, I have said so in my letter notifying the police of the sale. ( less than 7 days), pointing out I'll complete the variation when I have the details.
I suggest you let them know your intention ASAP..
M
As I see it, paragraph 10.36 (post #6), is describing guidance for a variation. So it is reasonable to take the two consecutive sentences together, as relating to a variation.Keeping my of authorities indefinitely is talking about empty slots you are yet to fill, not one for one variations, because if you don’t fulfil them then you probably don’t have good reason in the first place.
That’s why if you have a slot at renewal that has remained empty for a long time it will get removed.
But a variation isn’t keeping open an authority, it’s changing it for something else, there is also a big difference between say, 6 months and indefinitely!As I see it, paragraph 10.36 (post #6), is describing guidance for a variation. So it is reasonable to take the two consecutive sentences together, as relating to a variation.
Othere parts of the guidance may indeed point out what you say above, and that would be consistent in principle, with my view that the opportunity for a one for one variation will expire at some point.
Your right, that the guidelines are "quiet" on how long that is. Therefore individual police forces have set a time scale to facilitate consistent application of the guidance by their FLOs
M