The disadvantage of the creedmoor for the non-reloader is the cost of ammunition which can be up around £2.50-3.00 per round, this does make practice very expensive - if I didn't reload I'd not shoot half of the calibres that I do!This is an easy dilemma to solve. Cost has nothing to do with it. Far more nuanced...
The .243 Win is the preserve of blokes who are naturally way better shots than the .308 Win owners who say you need more gun for weeny English deer. (They say this cos they can’t shoot very well, and hope that more power makes up for their lack of precision.) Therefore the .243 Win.... er.... wins.
Alternatively....
The .308 Win is a man’s rifle, whereas the .243 Win is a lady’s rifle, or maybe a yoof rifle. Clearly, we are MEN and anything as poxy and weak as a 6mm must be a confession of poofterism and weakness. So obviously the .308 Win.... er.... wins.
But...
The 6.5 Creedmoor has arrived, and defeated both, unanimously. All the .243s and .308s ever made haven’t a hope in hell of competing with the sheer weight and awesomeness of all the new tacticool heavy barrelled chassis rifles, as they tip the Earth’s axis ever closer to total Creedmoor domination.
So... what’s it to be? Can you grow a proper special forces beard? Or are you a yoof? A lady perhaps? A crap shot or a living breathing laser beam? Or are you secretly yesterday’s man with a sentimental attachment to 19th century European antiques?
Provided your RFD stocks it and your rifle likes PPU ammoYanik101 - as you can see everyone will have a different opinion about this.
The simple answer, and all you really need to know can be summed up as follows;
Get the best of both worlds with a 7mm08PPU ammo is cheap and effective.
Yes, that is true.Provided your RFD stocks it and your rifle likes PPU ammo
Yes, that is true.
It may just be a coincidence but I’ve recently heard from a few 7mm08 users that all find the cheap PPU 140s shoot really nicely in their rifles. One guy told me he likes it so much he has given up reloading and just uses PPU in his 7mm08. I know all rifles are different but it has made me wonder if perhaps the 7mm08 is in general less fussy about ammo than others...
Possibly, I’ve only used it in 6.5x55, it is ok, about 1.5” at 100 yards but with ‘good’ factory ammo or homeloads it’s capable of half that, or better
No that’s fair one, my mate’s Brno ZK600 shoots it inside an inch and he’s over the moon with it. To be fair I shoot S&B in 6.5 creedmoor which is a similar price point, shoots well but it is a bit messy damage wiseI agree 100% that with homeloads or more expensive factory ammo you’ll get tighter groups than with PPU. But it’s £17 a box and shoots well in my rifle; I like it. The deer are not so fond of it!
Feeding home loads is miles cheaper.......Hey, we all had to start somewhere, agreed for stalking the odd round makes very little difference cost wise but if you want to practice then cost can come into it. But, stalking is not a cheap hobby and the ammunition is only a small part of the cost particularly if you pay for your stalking so if the cost of ammunition is a major concern it is possibly not the right sport to be getting into. That said it doesn't have to be a hellishly expensive hobby, particularly if you have your own ground and are a naturally good shot so less practice is required!
Yes, home loading is cheaper but can an under 18 be in possession of tubs of powder? Also he is probably not going to be after a good medal anything to start out, I don’t go out after medals!Feeding home loads is miles cheaper.......
if you count the cost of a GM Muntjac> CWD> Roe which people seek then the round is in all cases the cheapest part of shooting.
Agree with this, I was an air cadet from 13 to 18 or so and got some really good experience shooting a variety of rifles on different ranges as well as learning the right safety best practices and even supported teaching it to the younger guys coming through the ATCYanik, the cost of ammo is not a good reason to select one calibre over another, when you haven't even got a rifle yet.
Instead, you many want to plan out how you are going to work up to deer stalking. I would really recommend taking up air rifle shooting at least and if you have space at home, you can indeed do it safely in your back garden.
If you have one nearby, you could also think about joining something like the local Army/Navy/Air Force Cadets or, if you have a detachment at your school, the Combined Cadet Force. You will be able to shoot .22 and .223 rifles there in due course and will be taught the fundamentals of marksmanship, as well as all the other good things these organisations have to offer.
I understand you're keen on the idea of stalking but you might want to think about the wider shooting community as well. Target rifle clubs/clay clubs as a teenager are easier to join than getting permissions on land to stalk deer (with no experience/DSC/insurance etc).
Took longer than I thought.......This is an easy dilemma to solve. Cost has nothing to do with it. Far more nuanced...
The .243 Win is the preserve of blokes who are naturally way better shots than the .308 Win owners who say you need more gun for weeny English deer. (They say this cos they can’t shoot very well, and hope that more power makes up for their lack of precision.) Therefore the .243 Win.... er.... wins.
Alternatively....
The .308 Win is a man’s rifle, whereas the .243 Win is a lady’s rifle, or maybe a yoof rifle. Clearly, we are MEN and anything as poxy and weak as a 6mm must be a confession of poofterism and weakness. So obviously the .308 Win.... er.... wins.
But...
The 6.5 Creedmoor has arrived, and defeated both, unanimously. All the .243s and .308s ever made haven’t a hope in hell of competing with the sheer weight and awesomeness of all the new tacticool heavy barrelled chassis rifles, as they tip the Earth’s axis ever closer to total Creedmoor domination.
So... what’s it to be? Can you grow a proper special forces beard? Or are you a yoof? A lady perhaps? A crap shot or a living breathing laser beam? Or are you secretly yesterday’s man with a sentimental attachment to 19th century European antiques?