I’m struggling to make a decision here. I know 8 vs 10 has been discussed before but here goes:
The desire for a good set of binos has been building inside me for a few years, with some tax money I’m now looking for a second hand set of Zeiss/Swaro/Leica. I thought I was all set on 10x42 as I have a pair of Hensoldt 8x32 that I had serviced by a reputable technician a couple of years ago. They’re ok, comfortably better than a mate’s bushnells. But I used my boss’s Ultravids recently which “opened my eyes”… and with most sensible opinions suggesting 8x is better for most situations I’m wondering if I should get another pair of them. Preferably 8x32 but much more choice in 8x42 (I don’t believe I need more than a 4mm or sit pupil).
My hunting is mostly fallow around home (central NSW, Australia) so cleared rolling hills with light timber - glassing up to 1k away mostly closer, also reading cattle tags. But want to try for samba in Vic (high country/alpine/bush) sometime soon. The Hensoldts still do a respectable job but how much will I benefit from a better/newer 8x? TYB(s) can use the Hensoldts so they won’t go to waste. My biggest worry with the 10x is holding them steady - I can sit down, found a tree/rock/ use the ute but I can’t face the idea of a tripod. The idea of a closer image is appealing but not increased wobble…
Lastly the models I’m looking for are SLC HDs, old(er) ELs (still HD, which pushes the budget), Victory HTs and older Ultravids. I can probably scratch together $1400 (GBL700) at a push, less would be better. Have seen a few good options but I’ve been too slow or they’re too far away (don’t want to drop this much on a sight unseen pair on FB marketplace). I’m in the UK for another week and a half and the used market here has better options than Australia. I know things like Meostars, HD Conquests and Trinivids are good but I feel if I drop down to them I’ll always have a nagging regret even if it’s only in my head. Thoughts?