Badgers Again.

Because they don't want to publish the truth.
Trouble is the never ending positive propaganda from Packham BBC and alike. Public see them as adorable cuddly and persecuted when the absolute opposite is true. It's a big mustelid and will take anything up to 1 m off the ground.
I am surprised nobody had done research on badgers effect on earthworm populations and soil fertility. They are documented to eat many hundreds of worms per night. Do the maths.
D
 
Because they don't want to publish the truth.
Trouble is the never ending positive propaganda from Packham BBC and alike. Public see them as adorable cuddly and persecuted when the absolute opposite is true. It's a big mustelid and will take anything up to 1 m off the ground.
I am surprised nobody had done research on badgers effect on earthworm populations and soil fertility. They are documented to eat many hundreds of worms per night. Do the maths.
D
And the effects on ground nesting bees, particularly in the light of "our concerns over pollinators".

David
 
As I've said before, the cull was a total waste of time and money! We had a successful cull here just about four years ago, and badger numbers have now virtually recovered to pre-cull levels.
They are powerful, destructive animals, and do far more damage in a variety of ways than most people realise. As has been said, the common-sense way would be to treat them like foxes, where they are causing trouble, deal with them, where they are not, leave them alone. It's always worked with foxes.
 
I dont see why the government dont give out so many tags in diffrent areas and if need be have dropping off points if they want to do testing
 
The policy should reflect science and not political expediency or dogma.

No rocket science to understand that one pair of foxes will cover a territory where there could be one hundred badgers abroad, and the fox gets the blame whilst the badgers get a free pass.

It’s a question of balance, and few people wish to see the imbalance they cause, but wishful thinking and propaganda doesn’t feed the sett.

Hoping Reform will grasp this nettle, the others clearly will not, and everyone’s countryside suffers the consequences.
 
The policy should reflect science and not political expediency or dogma.

No rocket science to understand that one pair of foxes will cover a territory where there could be one hundred badgers abroad, and the fox gets the blame whilst the badgers get a free pass.

It’s a question of balance, and few people wish to see the imbalance they cause, but wishful thinking and propaganda doesn’t feed the sett.

Hoping Reform will grasp this nettle, the others clearly will not, and everyone’s countryside suffers the consequences.

Yes thats why i would look to see scat analysed - i have no doubt they do damage - in my opinion little compared to a fox - but science could show properly
 
The roe fight with them around here over my feeders
 

Attachments

  • 20251001190105.webp
    20251001190105.webp
    68.3 KB · Views: 88
  • 20250930200043.webp
    20250930200043.webp
    45.5 KB · Views: 88
Back
Top