Almost written as a BASC employee. However I am not a critic of BASC, I have for many, many years thought it to be a useless cash cow after knowing a couple of high ranking employees and therefore have no need for further criticism.
You will find from my posts that I am somewhat annoyed with the NGO for signing up to this. I am one of their very early members but will not be renewing. I will take private insurance because I no longer believe in supporting any shooting organisation purporting to be working for its members and not standing firm on defence eg Med certs.
I did not actually have you on my list of the usual suspects for a jibe about being a "BASC apologist". For what it is worth I am a member of 6 different countryside organisations; with the exception of one (the BDS) ALL are listed as a signatory on the announcement.
The simple fact is that this thread has succumbed, indeed it started out party to, the "in group morality / out-group hostility" sentiment against a certain organisation that has become prevalent on this site in recent times. It has become so prevalent that there is almost a cognitive dissonance when confronted with simple facts, if they are even recognised.
@enfieldspares showed what I suspect to be the reasoning behind ALL the organisations getting behind this when he posted the reply he received from the CPSA:
European legislation is, in all likelihood, going to outlaw lead in food products - therefore the European market for British Game will disappear.
Waitrose is refusing to buy game with lead in it, the other major supermarkets will probably follow suit - therefore the British market for game will disappear.
Without either of these markets Game Shooting becomes unsustainable. Fact.
The ONLY way to continue shooting is to move with the times and appease public opinion and faceless bureaucrats. The science, in this instance, matters not a jot. We have been painted into a corner.
The major organisations all recognise this. Whether you agree with it or not is entirely irrelevant. The truth is that there are fights that you can win, and there are fights that you cannot. In signing up to this statement the organisations have done exactly what they are supposed to do, they have defended the continued existence of shooting by realising that the ONLY way to continue game shooting in the modern day is to change with the times. If that defence means that a handful of people can no longer use their 100yr old guns to indulge their passions then so be it.
Just may be we might be able to keep the throwing stick ???
