Yes, this will be long, expensive, and complicated...
EVs are the easy part, but even when we have all converted to EVs the overall effect on global CO2 emissions will be minimal.
On the plus side, EVs are zero-exhaust-emissions vehicles, so at least we'll all soon be breathing cleaner and healthier air, which is good news, especially for city dwellers.
I think if you watch/rewatch Simon Michaux’s presentation you’ll realise he is telling us there isn’t sufficient materials to achieve this, and most certainly not globally, and nor do I imagine the rest of the world are going to just stand back and allow GB plc to have first dibs on all the minerals required in order to enable everyone to buy an EV (equivalent to total global supply of some of the rare Earth minerals), let alone provide the actual electricity to run them all. That aside, how many cars stop for refuelling on a motorway run? How long does that take in terms of time per vehicle? How many charge ports per service station would be needed to achieve a reasonable throughput? Ever waited a couple of minutes for a petrol pump to become available? Or is it that such journeys are to be curtailed/prohibited?
Apropos motorways, and generally speaking, most roads are still tarred, a product derived from the dregs of a distilled barrel of oil, once the lighter distillates, including both petrol and diesel as well as kerosene for aviation fuel etc are removed. The Petrol and Diesel are major tax earners for the treasury for the government of the day, in a way that electricity is not; is government going to pour these away or flare them off, without taking their erstwhile tax receipts out of the barrel? If they are, what about suggesting the means of making up the shortfall - pay per mile? Here was me thinking that they’re rather keener to control inflation, but I digress: the thrust of Michaux’s presentation is that the proposed ‘transition’ just isn’t going to work out as is currently envisaged, and he has presented his data and evidence to sufficient governments around the planet and found to be credible to the extent that the ‘leaders’ he meets with usually end up asking
him ‘what are we going to do?’!
Enjoy the interlude, it may be relatively brief!
Oh, and Profs Happer and van Wijngaarden at Princeton have conclusively proven that co2 does not drive global warming, see below, it rather renders the whole transition exercise along with ‘replaceable’ energy sources (whiles mistakenly referred to as ‘renewables’ - the wind and sunlight are renewable, but the hardware trying to harness these sources of energy aren’t) pretty pointless, as Michaux also suggests; the sooner we emulate the Chinese (who themselves are copying and improving upon the pioneering work of the Americans of the early nineteen seventies) and get busy with modular molten salt thorium reactors the easier it’s going to be to keep the lights burning, and meet the ever growing energy demands.