What exactly do you want me to say? I don't think we've agreed on one single point related to this issue, I don't really see how this is going to lead to any constructive dialogue. What exactly do you wish to achieve?
For what it's worth, the expression "European Superstate" is a journalistic one loaded with derision and deliberate fear mongering in my opinion. But setting that aside, I'm all for "ever closer union", always have been. I don't have a problem with European federalism. Some things are best dealt with at a supranational level, some things are best harmonised across countries, and some things are best dealt with at a national, regional or local level. They need not be in competition. Besides, there's nothing particularly marvellous about any national government that I've ever seen that would make me think that a supranational one that you choose to cooperate with (as opposed to being imposed) is worse. There, is that what you're after? I don't know whether you think that's achieved anything much.