Sol
Well-Known Member
Yes very much so, smaller partials would be easier absorbed but In reality how many of those are say within 2" of the shot site what for many of us, we would have no real issue trimming away.First, there's really not much difference shown by this study between the two groups.
Second, I suspect absorption from ingested lead depends on surface area per mass - so a pellet of No6 is likely be markedly-less problematic than the same mass of lead (or less, even) in itsy-bitsy, teeny-weeny fragments in the shoulder-meat of deer killed with high-velocity fragmenting bullet.
But then - who would not discard the meat from around such a bullet-strike?
I know there has been cases of fragmentation ending up in the haunches but in reality how often is that happening? I might not be an expert but I'd have to imagine the fragmentation of hitting bone, and hitting meat differs greatly as well.
Its pretty obvious on the carcass when a bullet travels behind the shoulder between both ribs without nicking them how clean and undamaged it is, hitting rib or shoulder on the otherhand Its minced and I wouldn't be surprised if fragments go well beyond the shot site.
Obviously as well that fragmentation Is also shared across an entire carcass, probably across several people eating it (10-40kgs of meat, dependant on the animal/species)
On the other hand I would imagine pheasant with the amount of lead that hits them actually has more lead particles (plus the bonus of accidently eating a BB too) per meat ratio what's likely to be spread around less people than venison for example.
