HungarianHuntsman
Member
Hi folks,
I am looking to soon buy my first hunting rifle. I found two used guns, a Mauser 225 and a Tikka M65, in nice condition for a reasonable price. Both guns seem very high quality, everything on them is wood and metal, and they both are great all-round calibers; the Mauser is 30-06 and the Tikka is 7X64. I have only had the chance to check out the Mauser in person; it is sold by a trustworthy reseller/servicer, and they even give a year-long warranty and help with attaching a scope. On the other hand, the Tikka is not sold by a reseller, so there is no warranty. However, I am still hesitant to choose the Mauser because I have had the chance to check out similar but newer Tikkas before, and I always really liked how slim and light they are. Is the M65 similarly light as compared to the Mauser as the M658, T3, or T3X? Or should I not care about this and just go ahead and choose the Mauser?
Any opinion or advice is welcome.
Thank you in advance!
I am looking to soon buy my first hunting rifle. I found two used guns, a Mauser 225 and a Tikka M65, in nice condition for a reasonable price. Both guns seem very high quality, everything on them is wood and metal, and they both are great all-round calibers; the Mauser is 30-06 and the Tikka is 7X64. I have only had the chance to check out the Mauser in person; it is sold by a trustworthy reseller/servicer, and they even give a year-long warranty and help with attaching a scope. On the other hand, the Tikka is not sold by a reseller, so there is no warranty. However, I am still hesitant to choose the Mauser because I have had the chance to check out similar but newer Tikkas before, and I always really liked how slim and light they are. Is the M65 similarly light as compared to the Mauser as the M658, T3, or T3X? Or should I not care about this and just go ahead and choose the Mauser?
Any opinion or advice is welcome.
Thank you in advance!
