Farmers and landowners think if one thing….money.
Really? If they only thought of money they'd have invested their money in something which generates better financial returns. The evidence is pretty clear that people farm or own land for different reasons.
Make deer management part of ELMS and you have their ears. Make it a criminal offence not to manage the deer on their land and now you have their full attention.
To the extent that legislation makes any undesirable thing go away, especially where there is little credible prospect of enforcement.
Make it the landowners responsibility to control the deer then the problem will be sorted.
That approach doesn't work for plant species and is even more unlikely to work with animal species.
It doesn’t need the BDS/BASC just the minister for agriculture.
Personally, I think we need to get away from the idea that centralised planning of wildlife is desirable or effective. There is already ample evidence that central planning tends to fail and that our (UK) "conservationist establishment" is of low calibre in terms of results and heavily politically infiltrated. This is a recipe for poor outcomes.
To the extent that our current approaches fail, then looking at the problem with an open mind seems desirable and I'm not instinctively in favour of measures like out of season shooting (of females) or night shooting.
Nor of measures which presume that a group of persons with little or no knowledge should be able to exert legal control over the people who are likely to be more knowledgeable about the requirements of their land. State intervention does not tend to bring the benefits it intends, so it is crucial to consider what the real outcome is likely to be.
The past ministers of agriculture have been obviously career politicians, but with backgrounds that include fireman, social worker, trade unionists, production engineer, barristers, metallurgy, advertising, political analysts, chemist and banker. The most popular background has been trade unionist. I do not comprehend how anyone thinks that people like this, who have very short tenures in the job, are qualified to even have an opinion. Luckily we have the Civil Service and the Permanent Secretaries leading that department have had zero relevant experience, knowledge or expertise - in most cases of anything outside the Civil service at all.