Not sure that statement is entirely fair.
If I may just chuck in a curve ball?
If a "suspect" is armed/believed to be armed, that is a whole new level for pain for the Old Bill.
It becomes an "armed operation" (spontaneous notwithstanding), this involves all manner of briefings, risk assessment, authorisations and deployment of sufficient armed officers to 'overwhelm' any perceived threat.
The reality is, there are probably insufficient armed resources on duty, to attend with and deal with 'poaching of deer with rifles' - usually at night.
It is not satisfactory, but it is a reality.
In the same vein.
I still cringe when I recall the case of the pigeon shooter, arrested by an armed Police team, who were responding to claims of 'man with a gun'.
View attachment 288585
I seem to remember that, Gamekeepers subsequently became involved in 'training' armed Police units.
Damned if they do, and damned if they don't.