Pulsar c50

One of the best reviews I have found



Yes, very well presented video, but again the actual footage leaves me disappointed, bear in mind this is the most expensive Digital NV out there I was expecting more, claims of superior build quality doesn’t automatically mean better performance.
I was trying to work out the distance of the zeroing box but guessed between 50/60yds as it was a 22lr rifle and the hedge line was estimated at around 200yds.
008 users have been happily shooting in the daytime for over 2 years, Pulsar have only just twigged.
Take a look at this footage of rabbits for comparison, head shot rabbit at 140yds through the PIP that doesn’t show on playback, the hedge line is bang on 200yds.
 
Both mine mounted fine I bought some hawke reach back minutes problem solved
I get the impression I prefer a more rearward mounting position than most.
The majority of the images I see of the Digex/Thermions show them mounted almost like day scopes.
Consequently, regular reach-back mounts weren't enough for me, so I used a long cantilever-type item to get the right eye relief, which put the turret aft of the bolt handle, hence the need for extra height. Not elegant, but comfortable nonetheless, thanks to the adjustable comb.
 
I get the impression I prefer a more rearward mounting position than most.
The majority of the images I see of the Digex/Thermions show them mounted almost like day scopes.
Consequently, regular reach-back mounts weren't enough for me, so I used a long cantilever-type item to get the right eye relief, which put the turret aft of the bolt handle, hence the need for extra height. Not elegant, but comfortable nonetheless, thanks to the adjustable comb.
I think most people really need a more rearward mounting position with these type of scopes, it's just that the marketing doesn't reflect that and the message of 'normal mounts' is pushed.

No need to get 'precious' about it and put up with having to lean into the scope to see the full field of view of the display...just buy suitable mounts as you have done Mr. Gain. 👍


Cheers





Clive
 
I had to mount the C50 quite high because the side turret fouls the bolt handle otherwise. This is a consequence of the C50/Digex/Thermions emulating the day-scope form factor but without their eye-relief.
What is the eye relief on the C50 please?
 
I've been using the C50 for a couple of weeks now. In 3 foxing outings I've had 5 dog foxes dropped on the spot. The daylight colour image is as good as you need for hunting (assuming you take your binos as well). The shift to twilight colour gives you another 30 minutes' "daytime" viewing after everything gets desaturated to the naked eye (the C50's real party trick -and it's a good one). After that you get another 20 minutes of really good b/w viewing without the IR. Then you'll need to put the IR on. The beam is impressively even, albeit at the cost of reach (200m). If you prefer a tight spotlight, get the cheaper C50 model without the IR unit (which comes with a mounting ring) and fit your preference. The Pulsar IR is by no means a "paperweight", just a different approach, and one that IMO is better suited to the majority of NV engagements.
All the mode changes are really easy to do, although each needs a small tweak of the focus, too. Also, you are likely to grab the aperture ring instead of the focus ring at first (you soon learn the difference).
The C50 zeroed easily and remains bang on target. However, while I could see my 2.5cm roundels, I couldn't see small-calibre bullet holes on paper. Having 1cm @100m clicks (actually 11mm) is convenient for fine adjustments. I prefer to shoot on 3.5x without the IR and on 7x with it. I don't expect 14x to give me a more workable image. I mostly hunt with thermal on 3x-5x so am comfortable hunting at "low" magnification.
Overall, the C50 is a premium item, scoring on overall quality instead of raw specifications. Others include mounts, IR and even an LRF, and at a lower overall cost, but those elements are only a benefit when it's your first "rodeo" (I already have a selection to choose from). In any case, I know my ranges and drops (from the old habit of making up a range card for any OP), plus, with the .204R or .17FB, it's almost always point-and-shoot.
Thats one of the benefits of a digital nv scope. Can be used the last bit of dusk. Just as the rats are coming out. Cant do that with tubed nv.
 
Presumably you mean the ones whose mounts didn't break and whose units didn't do the Chinese thing of working for a month or two then randomly moving zero or doing other weird crap?

Yep and theres many thousands of them that have had no issues whatsoever, remember a noisy minority makes more noise than a happy majority.
Because the Pards were affordable before Covid and SGC got in on the act, they were the first NV a lot of people had ever used of that type, the forums and FB was full of people not knowing what they were doing, struggling to zero because it’s the opposite to a conventional scope, I wish I had a quid for every time I read a post about zero shifting only for the person moaning didn’t know you had to press save when you have finished adjusting the co ordinates!

Re. the mount, one of my 008’s must have been switched between 2 rifles hundreds of times in the time I’ve owned it with no problems whatsoever, I do tighten with a torque screwdriver though, 18”lbs no more.
I agree it’s not as good as it could be but it’s an easy fix with a £50 Wraith mount, I have one fitted to the other on my C/F and it’s a lot better designed. One could argue that the Digex doesn’t come with mounts so upgrading the Pards is the same as forking out for mounts for the Digex but like I say, isn’t necessary for the vast majority of users.
 
Yep and theres many thousands of them that have had no issues whatsoever, remember a noisy minority makes more noise than a happy majority.
Because the Pards were affordable before Covid and SGC got in on the act, they were the first NV a lot of people had ever used of that type, the forums and FB was full of people not knowing what they were doing, struggling to zero because it’s the opposite to a conventional scope, I wish I had a quid for every time I read a post about zero shifting only for the person moaning didn’t know you had to press save when you have finished adjusting the co ordinates!

Re. the mount, one of my 008’s must have been switched between 2 rifles hundreds of times in the time I’ve owned it with no problems whatsoever, I do tighten with a torque screwdriver though, 18”lbs no more.
I agree it’s not as good as it could be but it’s an easy fix with a £50 Wraith mount, I have one fitted to the other on my C/F and it’s a lot better designed. One could argue that the Digex doesn’t come with mounts so upgrading the Pards is the same as forking out for mounts for the Digex but like I say, isn’t necessary for the vast majority of users.
But if your running say a 007 or a day scope your probs using 30 mill mount
 
Iv got some more was a clear night last night could easy see and pick eyes up 300 yards+ had 2 foxes last night
This is my first propa night vision scope and definitely would of not got the 2 foxes the was I use to lamp just need a thermal spotter now
 
Back
Top