Hi Sol, I was using 24× magnification for headshots, but I've now changed scope and dropped down to 9× and it's much better. Instead of the whole view down the scope being filled with the deer's head, I'm now far more aware of what's going on around the animal which makes me better able to anticipate any movement, or see another deer that might be moving into my field of fire and risk being accidentally hit.I think having a bullet that explodes effectively soon as It hits bone Is a good idea, but Its awful in other circumstances for lung and shoulder shots.
The .222 Is very damaging on roe I find great rifle for them, but so much jelly-shock and bloodshot.
Another thing about headshots unless we magically buy a new scope I cant personally see them becoming a normal thing for myself for a few years at least, we're using a pretty old fashioned Ziess 6x what for roe makes them in-between a pence, and a two pence in the crosshairs over 150 yards.
Even pretty close the crosshair takes up quite a large amount of the neck, why I've always taken head since I can see and visualise a little more where my POA Is at, but I couldnt really fathom taking 70 yard and onward shots with it often the crosshairs are chunky that I cant quite tell the wobble on such a small area.
This roe Is maybe 50 yards? Push that another 30-40 yards and that crosshair starts too block some information I want too be able too see.
I did start shooting with very thin crosshair scopes that had a quite a decent bit of zoom.
View attachment 473660
I think 12× would probably be the optimum for headshots. Certainly no more than that.