Not quite accurate, but I understand your confusion.They're supposed to inform you at the earliest opportunity that you are being recorded.![]()
Yea.... amusing viewing.Yep, so reading that if you are a lawful citizen and haven't committed a crime you can just carry on walking and say nothing.. You don't have to give your name or details, and if they detain you without setting out why you have the grounds to you can make a claim against them.. plenty of YouTube Auditors have done it scores of times, their reasoning is to educate the police into what they can get away with and what they can't. It's amusing viewing.
Thanks for that, I can see that it's not written in plain English, no wonder it's interpreted in so many ways... It must be extremely difficult for police constables to remember and interpret this correctly.For those in doubt see:
Sections 1-3 Police and Criminal Evidence Act (PACE) 1984 & PACE code A.
Yes agreed.Yea.... amusing viewing.
A cop who has some suspicion, and their tool to further investigate..... is to stop and search the person..... and either prove their suspicions (and lock em up) or not prove them (free to go)!
Walk off...... thus perhaps causing further suspicion. The cop is well within their rights to arrest them on suspicion of whatever they think the may have, or may not have been up to ...... if you've done nothing wrong.... worsening the situation.
We need to worry about creating a system of police who are afraid to 'police' and just get involved after the event!
On the information provided No.Last night around midnight one of my Granddaughters (Lives with us) was walking through a small Park/ Play area with a (Boy) friend.
Unmarked car pulled up and two females emerged and approached the kids….we’re police these are our numbers and this (Waving lanyard with something on end credit card sized) is our authority to stop and search you because you are acting suspiciously.
Checked down their socks and in their trouser waistbands, then they gave them a ticket to take to a police station in case they want a report on the action taken, then bade them goodnight.
Does anyone know if this is an okay procedure, like, is walking through a play area (About 35 mtrs x 40 mtrs.) surrounded by houses and a B road considered acting suspiciously enough to warrant being S&S?
Sarah Everard came to mind.
I will be accompanying her to police station.
Thanks, Ken.
more ACCURATE than youNot quite accurate, but I understand your confusion.



Good onemore ACCURATE than you![]()
As BWV is overt recording, officers must declare wherever possible when they are commencing audio and video recording during each and every encounter. The use of BWV must be proportionate and necessary to the situation. BWV use should be 'incident specific. 'Good one![]()
If you carried on reading, you’d find the below…As BWV is overt recording, officers must declare wherever possible when they are commencing audio and video recording during each and every encounter. The use of BWV must be proportionate and necessary to the situation. BWV use should be 'incident specific. '
Announcing and commencing recordingUsers should ensure that they check their camera at the start of their shift, andperiodically during their shift to ensure it is functioning correctly and has sufficientbattery. At the start of a recording, or as soon as practicable, the user is to make averbal announcement that they are recording both visually and audibly. Thisannouncement should be in clear understandable language, tailored to the subjectsthey are communicating with, considering any disabilities or impairments.Users should specifically ensure that this is complied with when operating in plainclothes, or in a private dwelling, as per the case of AB v Hampshire Constabulary,first decision under new IPT rules - The Investigatory Powers TribunalIf you carried on reading, you’d find the below…
“However, as a general rule, where an officer is in uniform and is clearly carrying or wearing a suitably identified camera (clearly labelled as an audio and visual recording device) this condition is considered to have been satisfied”
Which is why most forces have now opted for doing just that, or having a camera with a big colour screen on the front.
Last night around midnight one of my Granddaughters (Lives with us) was walking through a small Park/ Play area with a (Boy) friend.
Unmarked car pulled up and two females emerged and approached the kids….we’re police these are our numbers and this (Waving lanyard with something on end credit card sized) is our authority to stop and search you because you are acting suspiciously.
Checked down their socks and in their trouser waistbands, then they gave them a ticket to take to a police station in case they want a report on the action taken, then bade them goodnight.
Does anyone know if this is an okay procedure, like, is walking through a play area (About 35 mtrs x 40 mtrs.) surrounded by houses and a B road considered acting suspiciously enough to warrant being S&S?
Sarah Everard came to mind.
I will be accompanying her to police station.
Thanks, Ken.
Skip to 12:25 for the recap. Detained and searched for "giving us evils"...
View attachment 369086
Not as good as his other video where the officer thinks that anything his mother finds offensive is a public order offense.
funny how few real criminals get locked up but kids and old men get harrased. no faith in uk police, grew up knowing alot of copper sadly being a bully with a chip on their shoulder is almost discription
funny how few real criminals get locked up but kids and old men get harrased. no faith in uk police, grew up knowing alot of copper sadly being a bully with a chip on their shoulder is almost discription