Ade8mm
Well-Known Member
Given the likely-hood of an eventual lead ban on shot (for shotguns) and with full respect for the pro's and cons of same - lack of scientific evidence or otherwise etc, I have given a great deal of thought to my position post a lead shot ban.
Will I use my 1876 S X side Damascus barrel shotgun? Will I still use (occasionally) my even much older muzzle loader shotguns?
Damn right I will. I will be forced to use bismuth , tungsten etc. Even at around £1.35 + per shot.
Thing is I don't shoot zillions of rounds. I shoot for the pot and then either flighting duck or rough shooting so never shooting a box of cartridges on any shooting day /evening.
(Not sure I will be happy shooting a squirrel at that cost though. Could I afford a few squizzers at that price ? Sure but it would grate.)
If I was an pigeon decoyer/ professional pest controller then clearly the cost would have a great bearing and be forced use steel an limit range or put my costs up and maybe lose business?
Perspective.
Two weeks a mate of mine enjoyed a driven day in Wales for high birds . A 10 man team. Cost £25,000.. (yes you read that correct)
A great day shooting by all accounts but damn challenging birds.
Let us suppose each gun fired (being generous) 200 cartridges. If they were shooting bismuth @ 1.35 + a pop that would equate to £270 a man for ammo.
Less the cost of lead at, (say 40 pence a cartridge) the cost of the days shooting with bismuth costs our man £190 more than if he had lead. (the bismuth ammo cost 7.6% more than lead.
NB none of the above not includes travel costs, tips and the ale after etc
I doubt that an increased cost of 7.6% (£190) on a £2500 /man day's shooting due to using bismuth / whatever, post lead ban will put our man off.
I think this is perhaps if BASC is (allegedly) mainly supporting large game shoots is why they don't see this as a problem (Kes ??)
I would, however add that any lead replacement (bismuth/tungsten) in my experience does not kill anywhere near as cleanly as lead... And that will be the next target for the antis.....
As they say... Your mileage may vary
Will I use my 1876 S X side Damascus barrel shotgun? Will I still use (occasionally) my even much older muzzle loader shotguns?
Damn right I will. I will be forced to use bismuth , tungsten etc. Even at around £1.35 + per shot.
Thing is I don't shoot zillions of rounds. I shoot for the pot and then either flighting duck or rough shooting so never shooting a box of cartridges on any shooting day /evening.
(Not sure I will be happy shooting a squirrel at that cost though. Could I afford a few squizzers at that price ? Sure but it would grate.)
If I was an pigeon decoyer/ professional pest controller then clearly the cost would have a great bearing and be forced use steel an limit range or put my costs up and maybe lose business?
Perspective.
Two weeks a mate of mine enjoyed a driven day in Wales for high birds . A 10 man team. Cost £25,000.. (yes you read that correct)
A great day shooting by all accounts but damn challenging birds.
Let us suppose each gun fired (being generous) 200 cartridges. If they were shooting bismuth @ 1.35 + a pop that would equate to £270 a man for ammo.
Less the cost of lead at, (say 40 pence a cartridge) the cost of the days shooting with bismuth costs our man £190 more than if he had lead. (the bismuth ammo cost 7.6% more than lead.
NB none of the above not includes travel costs, tips and the ale after etc
I doubt that an increased cost of 7.6% (£190) on a £2500 /man day's shooting due to using bismuth / whatever, post lead ban will put our man off.
I think this is perhaps if BASC is (allegedly) mainly supporting large game shoots is why they don't see this as a problem (Kes ??)
I would, however add that any lead replacement (bismuth/tungsten) in my experience does not kill anywhere near as cleanly as lead... And that will be the next target for the antis.....
As they say... Your mileage may vary