flytie
Well-Known Member
Perhaps we could sort this out once and for all with a spelling contest!![]()
Good one Matt.
Guess the gud spellars are spent there time in educashun and not on the hill.![]()
I am a bit worried that this is turning into a bit of a p****** contest
Anyone who has done any amount of stalking or shooting will spot the inaccuracies and b******* a mile away. These dvd's of long range shooting, are they edited, you wouldn't make much money out of films of deer with broken legs/ backs/ burst guts / broken jaws
Stalking is not about how far you can shoot, stalk, walk or ****
It's about your ability to cleanly kill deer, if you get enjoyment, money, meat after that it's a bonus.
If killing deer at long ranges from vantage points was so efecient then I'd have got a 50cal years ago, it's about knowing the ground the deer and your rifle and spending time on the hill/forest, creeping about, watching deer .
Lets start culling long range shooters, as the only thing they kill is this forum and our reputation
I agree with all of the above, especially the cogent argument of Bambislayer.
If f i use my 6.5 with a 129gn SST zeroed at 1.75" high @ 100yds, it will be spot on at 200yds and drop 13.5" @ 300yds.
Now if folks want to shoot deer at 1000yds + with .338 Lapua Mags or .50 cal, use anemometers, range finders, have spotters and use their bullet drop charts while shooting deer, fine, fair play. But don't call it stalking, please don't, because it isn't.
ft