Not entirely right to say that they can't gain any experience of firearms. There is always the option of gaining experience via a school or cadet force, a home office approved club, or a miniature rifle club.It is kind of ridiculous that prior to gaining their own FAC they cannot gain any experience of firearms whilst under the guidance of an older experienced mentor.
Its not convent though, especially if your father or family shoots you've got it right there in a safe controlled environment.Not entirely right to say that they can't gain any experience of firearms. There is always the option of gaining experience via a school or cadet force, a home office approved club, or a miniature rifle club.
True, but not sporting experience and when my son applied for his SGC & FAC we were told that being a member of the school CCF and having knowledge and experience with firearms counted for nothing.Not entirely right to say that they can't gain any experience of firearms. There is always the option of gaining experience via a school or cadet force, a home office approved club, or a miniature rifle club.
Quite the reverse with my youngest who’s extensive shooting with the CCF provided evidence of safe handling and use of rifles - again I this seems to vary from FLO to FLO.True, but not sporting experience and when my son applied for his SGC & FAC we were told that being a member of the school CCF and having knowledge and experience with firearms counted for nothing.
I thought so too. If nothing else it teaches them safe use of firearms, makes checking they are clear second nature, and gives them a good appreciation of the dangers and capabilities of firearms.Certainly no sporting experience but I think it was probably a bit harsh of them to totally dismiss your son's shooting experience with the school CCF.
Yes he may not have had as much shooting experience as if he were regularly shooting with a rifle club, but he still should have obtained a good grounding in firearms safety, and some knowledge of the basics of marksmanship.
They’re not allowed to be in possession I.e. handle the firearm, nothing to do with discharging.I think a person of under 18 isn’t allowed to discharge a fac rifle unless they have an FAC themselves or they are using it at a home office approved facility ie a cadets training ground?
Very much in agreement with Tim here, if they review it then the law will become more restrictive, not less!Let's not rock the boat. The current system with regard to young people and firearms, despite its apparent inconsistencies, works.
You can bet your bottom dollar that if we agitate for change, any changes made will be more restrictive, not less. A public consultation would highlight the fact that the general public are not comfortable with young people having access to firearms, full stop.
The most important thing is that people stick to the rules we've got when introducing their children to shooting. They aren't onerous by any means.
(I speak as someone whose daughter has held an open FAC, and owned her own rifles, from the age of 14).
Really what is to be gained by lowering it to 13?Its not convent though, especially if your father or family shoots you've got it right there in a safe controlled environment.
Lowering it down to 13 with several extra safety precautions wouldn't be an unreasonable choice.
Rifle set up by adult.
Rifle loaded by adult.
Advised calibre (243.308/270?) (no inherent need for a kid to be firing one of the biggest legal calibres, that has a big ricochet risk)
Single round loaded for large centrefire rifles, Adult would hold magazine if follow up required.
The thing that's always baffled me is If a kid can shoot a centrefire rifle at 14 with a license, but a non-license holder cant, FAC's dont provide any safety courses on rifles in the grand scheme of thing its a piece of paper with rules attached.
Not that I have issues with FAC's I quite like our gun laws in this country, but blimey it would be nice if it was easier for the youth speaking as someone who was said youth during the pandemic!