My FAC used to carry this wording. Just looked at my current version that section has gone. I've got the whole lawful quarry thing now, but this older version is interesting. It was a common clause back then but MUST be read with the rest of the FAC. But clearly the idea of shooting animals for protection was a concept that had not gone unnoticed. Numerous people I met thought that they had deer on their ticket because of clause (a). They did not. But some wouldn't listen of course. This only applied to the ammunition. Now what I never considered was that I might have needed a clause in relation to the firearms that said I was allowed to shoot animals for the protection of other animals. As the question never arose I never asked. Frankly given the chance, I'd leave it. I could do without the media s*** storm that would go with it. Lawful or not!
View attachment 189969