Ah!lb-ft or lb-inches. OR Newton-Metres
I see the logic in that.
Thank you
Anyway - I set the torque driver to 35 oojuns and go from there.
Ah!lb-ft or lb-inches. OR Newton-Metres
Like I said 35 thingummies.I think you mean 35 in.lb
The T3 has steel inserts in the bottom plastic which make it pretty tough.
Units?Energy = 1/2 x mass x velocity²![]()
Oojun in imperial, thingummy in metric…Units?
Units?

Having never had a clue about any of this (as is clearly apparent), I went to do some Wikipedia reading. It turns out that N.m can be used for both torque and energy. It’s just possible that my confusion around ft.lb and lb.ft stems from dimly remembered gcse physics where N.m was used for both.I was just having a snigger at people who get torque (distance x force e.g. N.m, lb.ft) confused with the almost obsolete usage (except for firearms etc.) foot pound (ft.lb) of energy... sorry, you may continue
![]()
JoulesUnits?
Only on a leap yearHa, so if I set my torque screw driver to 35 what’s its and then check that the oojun is set in a corresponding angle during a full moon, then that is correct? Does that take into account that I am using open sights?

First class! But is 62in-lbs too much? In my ignorance I would have thought 35in-lbs to be nearer the mark. I don’t understand
First class! But is 62in-lbs too much? In my ignorance I would have thought 35in-lbs to be nearer the mark. I don’t understand
Nm. Although I have been a bit joking in my post, the original question was serious.
Reminds me of that German virgin NicentiteIn Germany the standard torque value is “gutentight”
I reckon you’ll not go far wrong !
![]()
Or the Russian hookerReminds me of that German virgin Nicentite
All wrong mate. Neither of the above are ratios as implied here. They are products: Force x Distance, Newton x metre = Nm and so on.Ft/lbs is not a measurement of torque it's the amount of energy needed to lift a 1lb weight 1 foot, torque is usually measured in newton/metres, lb/ft or lb/in