Fac air is it worth it ?

May be old in age but not in mind and definitely not stuck in my ways !!
Are you perhaps missing the fact that i have and do use FAC air and sub 12 , in the lower powders there is certainly nothing to touch the airgun and i have yet to see a powder burner deliver sedation or medication drugs .
PCP can of course be a hobby in itself , there are quite a few black powder users !
 
  • Like
Reactions: JTO
I take that remark badly lets say but its easy to type to someone you feel you won't ever come face to face with . It was obviously because you had zero worthwhile real facts and experiences that could stand up in debate.
BTW i grew up in the time that Drugs really hit the uk hard in Merseyside I have a list of dead mates from that time died too young or got locked away for a long time . Never touched the drugs .
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Reactions: JTO
I can see what BB is saying- FAC air at 22LR power levels doesn't seem to offer many advantages (except accuracy)- and does come with additional disadvantages (variable reliability, air top up etc).

I do think a rochocheting 18gr pellet or v deformed 30gr slug is less scary than a slightly deformed 22lr round though.......

I do disagree that 20 ft lbs is a sweet spot for fac air. That's less flat than a sub 12 177! IMO most of the time you want 22lr trajectory from a 16-28gr pellet- so 25-45 ft lbs. Perhaps dialing down for rats/pigeons in buildings is handy- although often sub 12 does this ok.

22lr has always been way over powered for most quarry (except fox)- 99% of quarry shot by 22lr have required far less power. And FAC air can achieve this safely and in the majority of cases- more accurately. I can really see the appeal.

The slugs have certainly changed the game- I can't believe they expand sufficiently to rarely exit quarry ? That's a brilliant feature. Plus it gives shooters distinct options.

The main reason I'm resisting FAC air is the same reason I'm resisting electronic scopes- it just seems like *another* thing to remember/bring/charge/source of error.

If FAC air was the norm- and suddenly 22lr was invented and marketed as "never run out of air again" it would be an easy sell for some......
 
it just seems like *another* thing to remember/bring/charge/source of error.
The only thing extra you need is a divers bottle... once you have it you're sorted, cheap enough to fill, £5 any size at my local, others may be about £8 per fill, don't worry about seals going & leaks, that's not such a problem as it was say 15- 20 years ago in the early days of pcp's.
My Fx Crown has been faultless, with over 100 full power shots @fac .22 before you need a top-up, I'm ratting mostly with mine, a smidge of holdover and I can stretch down the long 50-yard corridors on the pig unit and kill safely & cleanly. Squirrels in the treetops are not a problem, loads of fun.
They might seem expensive... but there are no pockets in a shroud.
Edit; I'm with ya on the digital/electronic scopes though 👍
 
I take that remark badly lets say but its easy to type to someone you feel you won't ever come face to face with . It was obviously because you had zero worthwhile real facts and experiences that could stand up in debate.
BTW i grew up in the time that Drugs really hit the uk hard in Merseyside I have a list of dead mates from that time died too young or got locked away for a long time . Never touched the drugs .
😂😂😂😂😂

Are you serious? everything that comes up you’ve been involved with and have done better than everything else.

As always, I bet your dog is blacker than his dog!!
 
The only thing extra you need is a divers bottle... once you have it you're sorted, cheap enough to fill, £5 any size at my local, others may be about £8 per fill, don't worry about seals going & leaks, that's not such a problem as it was say 15- 20 years ago in the early days of pcp's.
My Fx Crown has been faultless, with over 100 full power shots @fac .22 before you need a top-up, I'm ratting mostly with mine, a smidge of holdover and I can stretch down the long 50-yard corridors on the pig unit and kill safely & cleanly. Squirrels in the treetops are not a problem, loads of fun.
They might seem expensive... but there are no pockets in a shroud.
Edit; I'm with ya on the digital/electronic scopes though 👍

Yup I get that. I have a couple of PCPs sub 12 with a bottle. Agree with everything you say. Pointing skywards and dropping a squirrel is v rewarding.

I shoot them way more accurately than my springer- but topping up is still a faff. I do leave pellets in my cars though- so I can never forget them. Can't do that with ammo. So I suppose I remove one thing I can forget with a powder burner. Dropping birds from sitty trees in a hide 50-60 yards away strikes me as a great use of FAC air actually.
 
I can see what BB is saying- FAC air at 22LR power levels doesn't seem to offer many advantages (except accuracy)- and does come with additional disadvantages (variable reliability, air top up etc).

I do think a rochocheting 18gr pellet or v deformed 30gr slug is less scary than a slightly deformed 22lr round though.......

I do disagree that 20 ft lbs is a sweet spot for fac air. That's less flat than a sub 12 177! IMO most of the time you want 22lr trajectory from a 16-28gr pellet- so 25-45 ft lbs. Perhaps dialing down for rats/pigeons in buildings is handy- although often sub 12 does this ok.

22lr has always been way over powered for most quarry (except fox)- 99% of quarry shot by 22lr have required far less power. And FAC air can achieve this safely and in the majority of cases- more accurately. I can really see the appeal.

The slugs have certainly changed the game- I can't believe they expand sufficiently to rarely exit quarry ? That's a brilliant feature. Plus it gives shooters distinct options.

The main reason I'm resisting FAC air is the same reason I'm resisting electronic scopes- it just seems like *another* thing to remember/bring/charge/source of error.

If FAC air was the norm- and suddenly 22lr was invented and marketed as "never run out of air again" it would be an easy sell for some......
To me FAC air should be modest , i have run a PCP and it measured up poorly against the very inexpensive , low-low maintainance of the 22 LR . You can of course run the 22 LR at a wide range of power levels . Someplace around 15 ft lb in a 22 airgun is perfect for rats and ferals in barns and shot up into trees as a steep trajectory it is pretty darn flat a long way up ( remember trajectory is horizontal travel that the factor in the curve, not the distance of flight path ) many forget that or have yet to learn it . windage is windage whatever though
How can a PCP that fires the same 40 grain lead slug around the 1000 fps be better than a 22 rf in use ? They are equal in the ballistics! Dont judge a broken down rusty old rf ,fed with cheap bulk ammo and maintained poorly against a decent and modern PCP with premium ammo though its just not representative.
Personally i have been shooting a lot of smaller quarry with 22 Hornet CF this last 10 years plus and the last year or so also with a 223 . Its cheap enough to hand load for , gives greater range than RF or FAC air . with the 22 rf though i can shoot a couple of hundred rounds without really thinking of the time re-loading or the cost of the ammo
 
To me FAC air should be modest , i have run a PCP and it measured up poorly against the very inexpensive , low-low maintainance of the 22 LR . You can of course run the 22 LR at a wide range of power levels . Someplace around 15 ft lb in a 22 airgun is perfect for rats and ferals in barns and shot up into trees as a steep trajectory it is pretty darn flat a long way up ( remember trajectory is horizontal travel that the factor in the curve, not the distance of flight path ) many forget that or have yet to learn it . windage is windage whatever
In what way did your FAC PCP measure up poorly ? Modern ones are reliable and ridiculously accurate. They barely existed 10-15 years ago- the change in tech has been incredibly quick. How old was your one that you didn't get on with ? 22LR at multiple power levels is far far less useful than people think IMO. The super short ones are still not especially safe to point skyward and personally I have had a lot of accuracy and feed issues with them. The HV ones- who needs them ? Perhaps for fox at 80-100 yards when a sub can be Loopy. But the noise puts a lot of people off and most would prefer a HMR or CF for such situations.
 
How can a PCP that fires the same 40 grain lead slug around the 1000 fps be better than a 22 rf in use ? They are equal in the ballistics! Dont judge a broken down rusty old rf ,fed with cheap bulk ammo and maintained poorly against a decent and modern PCP with premium ammo though its just not representative.

Quite easily it can- when and after it hits the quarry. A 40gr slug will expand FAR better than a 22LR bullet. And FAC air has many many options. You can tweak your pellet/slug as much as you like. 19-40gr in .25 cal. That's a heck of a variation. There's no way they will all behave the same as a 40gr 22lr bullet on quarry/hard ground with equal ballistics after impact and after richochet etc. I certainly don't compare a knackered 22lr rifle to £1.5k gun. But unless you use non expanding match grade ammo- the 22LR isnt as accurate as FAC air with heavy slugs.
 
In what way did your FAC PCP measure up poorly ? Modern ones are reliable and ridiculously accurate. They barely existed 10-15 years ago- the change in tech has been incredibly quick. How old was your one that you didn't get on with ? 22LR at multiple power levels is far far less useful than people think IMO. The super short ones are still not especially safe to point skyward and personally I have had a lot of accuracy and feed issues with them. The HV ones- who needs them ? Perhaps for fox at 80-100 yards when a sub can be Loopy. But the noise puts a lot of people off and most would prefer a HMR or CF for such situations.
We need to agree to disagree on these matters then
 
Personally i have been shooting a lot of smaller quarry with 22 Hornet CF this last 10 years plus and the last year or so also with a 223 . Its cheap enough to hand load for , gives greater range than RF or FAC air . with the 22 rf though i can shoot a couple of hundred rounds without really thinking of the time re-loading or the cost of the ammo

I agree- although I'm a .17H man myself. And I agree re the cost of running a 22LR is super cheap. The running costs of FAC air would be as cheap or cheaper. Purchase price the fac air loses all day long- but you cited running costs and lack of time reloading. And I think Fac matches or exceeds 22lr here.
 
Quite easily it can- when and after it hits the quarry. A 40gr slug will expand FAR better than a 22LR bullet. And FAC air has many many options. You can tweak your pellet/slug as much as you like. 19-40gr in .25 cal. That's a heck of a variation. There's no way they will all behave the same as a 40gr 22lr bullet on quarry/hard ground with equal ballistics after impact and after richochet etc. I certainly don't compare a knackered 22lr rifle to £1.5k gun. But unless you use non expanding match grade ammo- the 22LR isnt as accurate as FAC air with heavy slugs.
Again we must disagree. There is a huge amount of different .22 rf ammo that gives various power levels and different weights , even very specialised " special purpose ammo " . Your honestly just lacking in knowing all the available ammo types even the plain whacky stuff like shot loads for large insects and clay / lead mix for fairgrounds , extra heavy subsonic for police military units
 
Back
Top