I was told deer damage but I don’t think so

We had about two acres planted after clear fell. The saplings were weevil infested and died, the weevils didn’t affect and of the plants around the saplings. I would therefore not suggest this is weevil damage.
 
Utectok is not to blame here, the forestry manager needs to explain what has caused the tree losses, as it isn’t browsing damage.
 
That's been intentionally sprayed with glyphosate. Who would benefit from the trees being killed off? Because they've clearly targeted them. Glyphosate is cheap & unfortunately easy to buy.
 
Deer damage seen on the banks of the Tay this spring 😳
Fraying damage by deer, over in Baltimore (aka Blat ‘em more), according to a local forester….
IMG_1887.webp


My money would be on either weevil damage ( the percentage is too high to realistically be herbicide unless it was deliberate, ie vandalism), or less likely but possible a diseased batch of plants (this happens sometimes, including here): the problem can be identified and thereafter acted upon, but there’s a world of difference between deer and sheep damage, let alone weevil and some pathogen impacting on the plant batch, and merely guessing or attributing it to the catch-all ‘deer damage’ is akin to blaming man made carbon dioxide for climate change - telling…
 
Agree glyphosate but don't think it's drift John..look around the immediate area, nothing dead outside the halo around tree. Been spot sprayed with a knapsack.
Well yes but we can also think that some things are highly susceptible to glyphosate. Grape vines especially, perhaps the trees could be also.
 
Back
Top