gonzo
Well-Known Member
The official wording went up yesterday:
UK REACH restriction for lead in ammunition, 27 June 2025
Reading the wording for the proposed law changes, I reads:
" ‘calibre’ means the measurement of the interior (the bore) of a firearm’s barrel and the diameter of projectile used"
The way I read this is, the interior measurement of a barrel is that of the lands. For .243 this would be 6mm. Well below 6.17mm ban limit.
It is common to use this minor diam when describing metric calibre designations.. (eg. .308win/7.62 NATO has a lands diam of 7.62mm. The bullet diam is closer to 7.82mm. ) And they are using the metric measurement in the legal wording for the ban, this convention should hold.
And the diameter of the projectile USED, would be the bullet I load with, rather than the nominal bullet for this chambering.
So if loading with a bullet undersized by a thou, it might be arguable that this dodges the ban.
(I'm only playing devil's advocate here. Challenging this is for someone with deeper pockets than me!)
UK REACH restriction for lead in ammunition, 27 June 2025
Reading the wording for the proposed law changes, I reads:
" ‘calibre’ means the measurement of the interior (the bore) of a firearm’s barrel and the diameter of projectile used"
The way I read this is, the interior measurement of a barrel is that of the lands. For .243 this would be 6mm. Well below 6.17mm ban limit.
It is common to use this minor diam when describing metric calibre designations.. (eg. .308win/7.62 NATO has a lands diam of 7.62mm. The bullet diam is closer to 7.82mm. ) And they are using the metric measurement in the legal wording for the ban, this convention should hold.
And the diameter of the projectile USED, would be the bullet I load with, rather than the nominal bullet for this chambering.
So if loading with a bullet undersized by a thou, it might be arguable that this dodges the ban.
(I'm only playing devil's advocate here. Challenging this is for someone with deeper pockets than me!)



