I laughed when he said that the 243 was used by women and kids who might be sensitive to recoil. Interesting![]()
300 PRC is fineI never really worried about recoil until I shot a 600 Nitro double rifle owned by a chap who was a ft bigger than I am with a LOP to match
NEVER again
505 Gibbs is a bit sharp
458 Lott is significant
404 Jeff is just fine
I don't know about 300 PRC but the rest of those on the image above are insignificant
Clever analysis though![]()
i believe that sort of thing can indeed hurt you, and require retraining to sort out the flinch/feeling of about to be hurt, and tensening up, when pulling the trigger. I believe it can be done via dry firing and through shooting air guns and then rifles with low recoil as well.Most shooters say they are not bothered by recoil, but that they get the best accuracy with something small like a 243/222/223/22 etc. Funny that. I do think recoil affects accuracy - in weird ways short term and long term. I'm not ashamed to say I have a flinch, that I have to work hard to counteract. It started when I used an ill fitting (too short a stock) unmoderated 270 for a summer when still a teenager.
That is generally how it is perceived in my shooting circle, women, kids and invalids.I laughed when he said that the 243 was used by women and kids who might be sensitive to recoil. Interesting![]()
As is the .270It is true in the US the .243 is viewed by many as a ladies or youth cartridge.
As is the .270
There is no $200 fee on a tax stamp for NFA items, and that includes suppressors.Indeed but the .270 does have a bit more kick than the .243. The other consideration is that in the US moderators / suppressors are very rarely used for hunting, mainly due to the $200 tax stamp that has to be paid to acquire one.