Seanpaul,three key words are worth being clear on "need" and "good reason", they mean that your need has to be proven by good reason to possess to your police force licensing officer although the police are now supposed to process the request as a non-objector,they have to be confident of the applicants motives for wishing to acquire a prohibited firearm.,whether it is conditioned as a Section 1 Humane Dispatch /Slaughtering Instrument or not. I have a 2-shot .32 revolver and have logged all of my uses ,total since grant and acquisition-162 incidents..rtas/entrapments/domestic humane dispatches.There is no doubt that a pistol is useful ,however the trend is to grant to professional users and amateurs face an uphill process to be successful..also a revolver is safer to handle as it can be single or double action in usage...9mm unrestricted semi ? Would not "need "one as I have no "good reason" for a full mag capacity,and I and the police agree that the criteria has been met....in addition the .22 rifle and 410 shotgun are the tools of choice in most rta scenarios.There are always those elements that like the idea of possession of a pistol to buck the system of the handgun ban, and the police know that..so any application has to be watertight.