A bit closer to home would be stop growing "wild bird cover" on land that previously grew wheat/barley/rape/beans.
Stop throwing away "past sell by date" food which has to be of a certain shape before it is boxed then shipped here.
Sort out the bi-catch trawling
Then start to mention
"sustainable use"
The example that I'm thinking of involved some kind of mountain goat or antelope. Maybe a species of markhor?
If I remember correctly, the situation was such that numbers had become perilously low, putting the species at risk of being wiped out altogether. All hunting had been banned, but local poachers continued to kill them indiscriminately, not only for food but because they viewed them as a pest, competing with their livestock for the limited available grazing.
The project involved re-introducing hunting on a strictly limited basis to fee-paying hunters from abroad. Suddenly this gave the species some value. Local people benefited from the income generated, so instead of persecuting the animals they started to protect them, and numbers began to increase quite rapidly. It was a win-win situation all round.
The young chap who monitored it all was, I believe, initially quite anti-hunting, but quickly changed his view as he saw how well the situation played out.
It was him, I think, who came up with the term "sustainable use conservation" to describe this model of wildlife management.
Now, I may have got a lot of the details wrong there, but you can get the gist of it I hope.
I think he was interviewed about it on the Fieldsports Channel, possibly some time during Covid? Maybe someone else remembers?