Better detail than the alpex lite then?I have some footage of fox cubs I can upload using the V2 .. They were around the size of a Hare in size past 100yds distance..
The Alpex Lite is an Airgun Scope..Better detail than the alpex lite then?
Ahh fair enough! I already have the alpex 4k lrf for foxing, looking for something on the rimmy, might try that v2!The Alpex Lite is an Airgun Scope..
The Zulus is a better night vision scope at longer range, you would be better comparing to it's big brother the Alpex 4K original .. that F1.2 lens can whoop some ass at long range, poor atmospherics , etc..
Can anyone tell me if the 4K Lite can be installed on a .308 centerfire caliber? I read that it was designed for air rifles and rimfire calibers.The Alpex Lite is an Airgun Scope..
The Zulus is a better night vision scope at longer range, you would be better comparing to it's big brother the Alpex 4K original .. that F1.2 lens can whoop some ass at long range, poor atmospherics , etc..
Just started to use my Alpex 4k on the rimfire.I’m considering getting a .22lr set up for bunny bashing - night and day.
Im considering these two units, what’s better out of the two?
I already have it torch etc as I use the alpex 4k on my foxing rifle
Can anyone tell me if the 4K Lite can be installed on a .308 centerfire caliber? I read that it was designed for air rifles and rimfire calibers.
I'd definitely have a v2 over a Alpex lite, no questionsAhh fair enough! I already have the alpex 4k lrf for foxing, looking for something on the rimmy, might try that v2!
This “airgun scope” definition puzzles me - especially if it can endure a .308 recoil. Much is made of the short eye relief and the risk of injury from heavier chamberings but surely just holding your head back the required distance will eliminate this (with a possible reduction in sight picture) but is this really such a problem or can the simple compromise of eye relief over sight picture not make it a decent (and inexpensive) proposition for centrefire rifles?yes , and i have one on a .308
This “airgun scope” definition puzzles me - especially if it can endure a .308 recoil. Much is made of the short eye relief and the risk of injury from heavier chamberings but surely just holding your head back the required distance will eliminate this (with a possible reduction in sight picture) but is this really such a problem or can the simple compromise of eye relief over sight picture not make it a decent (and inexpensive) proposition for centrefire rifles?
![]()
Interesting thank you - and dare I say it a simple fix for what looks like a very good sight….they are recoil rated to the same as the big alpex 4k, and have 45mm eye relief what's fine , like you say just mount it 10mm further forward.
the benefit of having such a small , light and compact scope well out weight any cons , I can't say there is any cons with that scope on that rifle tbh
What I meant was whether it could physically withstand the recoil of a large caliber in terms of electronics and structure, the ocular relief can be worked on, this is because the Hik specifies compressed air and rimfire.
Thanks for this infoits recoil rated to the same as the big alpex 4k, both 1000g recoil rated
they are rated the same as its bigger brother ! so no problem with recoil . so if you want to reduce the weight its a positive . i have one on my 6.5 x 47LWhat I meant was whether it could physically withstand the recoil of a large caliber in terms of electronics and structure, the ocular relief can be worked on, this is because the Hik specifies compressed air and rimfire.
they are rated the same as its bigger brother ! so no problem with recoil . so if you want to reduce the weight its a positive . i have one on my 6.5 x 47L