That’s far too a sensible Tim, they’ll never do that.The counter argument is to move S1 to s2
Or ten year licences…
That’s far too a sensible Tim, they’ll never do that.The counter argument is to move S1 to s2
Precisely, its the "fit to be entrusted" stuff that needs attention with a focus on FLDs having robust training and an independent inspection regime to assist them in maintaining the standards of firearms administration that we are entitled tooThe S1 and S2 debate is a smoke screen. He was a violent man who shouldn't have had any gun licenses, access to knives or other tools that could harm people.
Magazine capacity is irrelevant as is the semi-auto action, what is relevant is police compliance with the "fit to be entrusted" requirement of the Firearms Act. Post Dunblane it was politically expedient to do a 100 year cover up and ban handguns instead , it would again be politically expedient to ban semi-auto shotguns under the guise of "stricter gun laws" , however the shooting community needs to stand firm on this and to my mind seek to have the classified findings of the Dunblane report made public in respect of the then police failings.The whole community, including the shooting community was failed by Devon & Cornwall Police.
As the inquest verdict, this individual should never been in possession of a firearm or shotgun.
As to whether it was a pump action, semi or conventional sxs or OU, it really matters not. A 3 shot semi / pump may be able to fire 3 quicker than a double, but a double is quicker to reload. Terminal effect is just the same.
There is a big difference between a high capacity semi holding 8 or 9 shells - but these are an FAC item.
Nothing to do with a 'politically expedient' cover up.Post Dunblane it was politically expedient to do a 100 year cover up...
indeed, and likely that the police cocked up like they did re plymouth so lock it all away.Nothing to do with a 'politically expedient' cover up.
It was all to do with protecting the parents of those children who were murdered, from details that no parent needs to hear.
I gave a factual response to an incorrect statement.indeed, and likely that the police cocked up like they did re plymouth so lock it all away.
I will accept your augment that there would have been details that no parent should hear but it doesn't address the fact that the 100 year closure also protects those that should have been exposed.Nothing to do with a 'politically expedient' cover up.
It was all to do with protecting the parents of those children who were murdered, from details that no parent needs to hear.
I simply don't buy that. Many other child murder cases have occurred since Dunblane, albeit not multiple fatalities, and the details of these cases have not been hidden away for 100 years.It was all to do with protecting the parents of those children who were murdered, from details that no parent needs to hear.
Can anyone tell me what legal shooting sports is a gun like the one that he used.View attachment 297439
I can remember over 30 years ago being on a clay pigeon shooting ground and a guy walked on to one of the stands with a pump action and some of the old shooters who were waiting said aup we got one here.
That was the answer I was waiting to hear.Practical shotgun.
normal pump action are still popular if used with sound moderators as semi autos will not cycle subsonic cartridges and not easy to fit a sound mod to a shotgun with two barrels.
That name alone winds me up, it should be called 'combat shotgun'. The practitioners should join the T.A. instead.Practical shotgun.
normal pump action are still popular if used with sound moderators as semi autos will not cycle subsonic cartridges and not easy to fit a sound mod to a shotgun with two barrels.
That was the answer I was waiting to hear.
Practical shotgun
But that is not what he said he wanted the shotgun for he said he wanted it for clay pigeon shooting when the police got the information from the gun dealer and him what he had bought for me alarm bells should have been ringing.
It's my believe that is what is coming to us all.However if you accept what you are saying you have introduced section 1 criteria on section 2 firearms, which currently do not apply.