A similar thread to this one here:@wytonpjs any input?![]()
I use the 110gr TTSX in my .270 for fallow at range. I’ll be taking it up on Sunday for this year’s week on reds in Scotland. I’ll be taking a .308 too using 130gr TTSX, a round which has served me very well during the 13 weeks I managed over the years on Arran 
That was the first week I’d one on red stags with the .270 and it was flawless, putting 5 beauties down at some good ranges up on the hill. That spiker with you was only my 6th. After years using 20” .308s with 130gr TTSX on all reds I’ve taken previously, I think I’m a total convert now to the .270 for all fallow and reds.
Previous thread with loads:
I'm using 110gr TTSX in my .270 and 130gr in both my 308s and have been for about 8 years now. The 22" .270 has a MV of 3298 fps using N135, the .308s (both 20" D18 Sako/Tikka barrels) 2945 fps using IMR4895. Both calibres are principally used on reds and fallow and if I had to be honest, I would say I get more meat damage from the 130gr TTSX. Both put animals on the deck PDQ and with minimal or no running from HILAR shots.
I have some 110gr .308 TTSX to load but haven't got around to doing that yet nor trying the N140 I have with the 130's.
I have some 110gr .308 TTSX to load but haven't got around to doing that yet nor trying the N140 I have with the 130's.