CZ455 - Minute of Fly

Haldon UK

Well-Known Member
First time out with the little CZ I bought on here a couple of months ago.

It's a long-term build project with most bits due for upgrade as-and-when parts become available. My aim is to create a light and accurate trekking rifle, suited to the type of quarry & terrain I have access to - small game around South Devon.

I like this rifle for a few reasons: it's value-engineered as a simple .22... no bells and whistles, it was a steal at £220 / in 'used but essentially brand new condition'. It's adequately manufactured from steel with very little plastic (stock aside), it has a wide array of established aftermarket kit, it's highly serviceable and it looks neat and tidy.

I currently have it sitting in the factory polymer stock and since this outing have fitted an Atlasworxs trigger guard. A GRS Hunter Light stock is on order which will be glass & pillar bedded. Unfortunately, I'm not a huge fan of the trigger guard - the fitment isn't 100% (bit gappy), the wall section of the floor plate is very thin and the countersunk holes have very little contact with the screws. I've CAD'd my own and have an associate who is going to CNC it for me, for when the GRS arrives.

The trigger is the standard unit but dialled down as light as she'll go (remains safe). It feels quite good to me, however I'm not a fan of the fully exposed mechanism - a Timney will probably go in at some point.

The scope is a Hawke Vantage WA30 4-16 x 50 with sub-sonic reticle. Again, it seems fine for budget glass, but will likely be upgraded. Annoyingly, the turrets do not sit squared-up to the reticle by a couple of degrees which is noticeable when mounted. Doesn't seem to impact accuracy or dialling the turrets around, but it looks a little wonky.

Finally got the rail sorted for a proper fitting Britannia Rails model. The steel Contessa one felt way sturdier, but was a make-do design carried over from the 452 (longer ejection port).

Anyway... she seems to shoot alright, considering some of the concessions above.

I tried a range of ammo to see if there were any obvious preferences, but all seemed 'ok'.

I was impressed by just how quiet the CCI Quiet's actually are (akin to a suppressed PCP air rifle). If I was only tucked away at 50yrds all day plinking, this might get my vote for discretion alone.

For my purposes however, the Eley Hollow Subs seemed to square-up better than others. Truth be told, they were grouping beyond me on the day, so at a guess; a little over MOA at present. I also need more time behind the bolt!

Having zero'd and played around with a few types of ammo, I loaded another mag of the Eley subs. Just before taking my first shot, a blue bottle landed in the lower right corner of the target. Sorry to admit, I couldn't resist (here come the animal cruelty crew :lol:), but I was a little bit chuffed to see it vaporised!!!

Screenshot 2021-10-12 104148.webp






2021-10-09 10.58.58.webp

2021-10-09 11.03.58.webp

2021-10-09 22.28.01.webp
 
Muhahahaha,

You wouldn't be the first to shoot a fly, many years ago at Bisley during a Gallery rifle shoot, one of my good friends and former team GB gallery champ, blew the comp, due a big fat bluebottle landing on the outer edge of the target, he couldn't resist. He lost the comp but splatted the fly, with a .38

I have the very same model of rifle and its disgustingly accurate,, I reinforced the standard stock with carbon tubes, I too dislike the agricultural look of the standard CZ triggers and replaced mine with an alloy one.

RWWG2Dv.jpg

I plan to take this rifle hunting when I clearance to shoot on some land, so far it has only claimed a very large slug which was crawling/ sliming? its was across the target backstop!
zAtDPwX.jpg


P.S

Don't get the Tinmey they are pretty inconsistent, if you look on the American forums they get quite a bad rep as QC isn't that great, some people even said they were worse than the standard CZ triggers!
 
Muhahahaha,

You wouldn't be the first to shoot a fly, many years ago at Bisley during a Gallery rifle shoot, one of my good friends and former team GB gallery champ, blew the comp, due a big fat bluebottle landing on the outer edge of the target, he couldn't resist. He lost the comp but splatted the fly, with a .38

I have the very same model of rifle and its disgustingly accurate,, I reinforced the standard stock with carbon tubes, I too dislike the agricultural look of the standard CZ triggers and replaced mine with an alloy one.

RWWG2Dv.jpg

I plan to take this rifle hunting when I clearance to shoot on some land, so far it has only claimed a very large slug which was crawling/ sliming? its was across the target backstop!
zAtDPwX.jpg


P.S

Don't get the Tinmey they are pretty inconsistent, if you look on the American forums they get quite a bad rep as QC isn't that great, some people even said they were worse than the standard CZ triggers!
My stalking mate and I used to spend hours shooting flies with air rifles!
We had to wait for them to land first, however.
 
zAtDPwX.jpg


P.S

Don't get the Tinmey they are pretty inconsistent, if you look on the American forums they get quite a bad rep as QC isn't that great, some people even said they were worse than the standard CZ triggers!

Great grouping... what happened to the fifth? :p

Very impressed though and pleased to hear that better accuracy is feasible.

Can I ask what trigger guard have you got on that?

Thanks for the heads-up on the Timney unit. I also had a look at the Scar system a short while ago... bit more expensive, but potentially a better route. Then again, the current one is working fine so it might be that I'm just burning cash for no good reason?!!!
 
Muhahahaha,

You wouldn't be the first to shoot a fly, many years ago at Bisley during a Gallery rifle shoot, one of my good friends and former team GB gallery champ, blew the comp, due a big fat bluebottle landing on the outer edge of the target, he couldn't resist. He lost the comp but splatted the fly, with a .38

I have the very same model of rifle and its disgustingly accurate,, I reinforced the standard stock with carbon tubes, I too dislike the agricultural look of the standard CZ triggers and replaced mine with an alloy one.

RWWG2Dv.jpg

I plan to take this rifle hunting when I clearance to shoot on some land, so far it has only claimed a very large slug which was crawling/ sliming? its was across the target backstop!
zAtDPwX.jpg


P.S

Don't get the Tinmey they are pretty inconsistent, if you look on the American forums they get quite a bad rep as QC isn't that great, some people even said they were worse than the standard CZ triggers!
Is the 5th shot under the 5p ?
 
First time out with the little CZ I bought on here a couple of months ago.

It's a long-term build project with most bits due for upgrade as-and-when parts become available. My aim is to create a light and accurate trekking rifle, suited to the type of quarry & terrain I have access to - small game around South Devon.

I like this rifle for a few reasons: it's value-engineered as a simple .22... no bells and whistles, it was a steal at £220 / in 'used but essentially brand new condition'. It's adequately manufactured from steel with very little plastic (stock aside), it has a wide array of established aftermarket kit, it's highly serviceable and it looks neat and tidy.

I currently have it sitting in the factory polymer stock and since this outing have fitted an Atlasworxs trigger guard. A GRS Hunter Light stock is on order which will be glass & pillar bedded. Unfortunately, I'm not a huge fan of the trigger guard - the fitment isn't 100% (bit gappy), the wall section of the floor plate is very thin and the countersunk holes have very little contact with the screws. I've CAD'd my own and have an associate who is going to CNC it for me, for when the GRS arrives.

The trigger is the standard unit but dialled down as light as she'll go (remains safe). It feels quite good to me, however I'm not a fan of the fully exposed mechanism - a Timney will probably go in at some point.

The scope is a Hawke Vantage WA30 4-16 x 50 with sub-sonic reticle. Again, it seems fine for budget glass, but will likely be upgraded. Annoyingly, the turrets do not sit squared-up to the reticle by a couple of degrees which is noticeable when mounted. Doesn't seem to impact accuracy or dialling the turrets around, but it looks a little wonky.

Finally got the rail sorted for a proper fitting Britannia Rails model. The steel Contessa one felt way sturdier, but was a make-do design carried over from the 452 (longer ejection port).

Anyway... she seems to shoot alright, considering some of the concessions above.

I tried a range of ammo to see if there were any obvious preferences, but all seemed 'ok'.

I was impressed by just how quiet the CCI Quiet's actually are (akin to a suppressed PCP air rifle). If I was only tucked away at 50yrds all day plinking, this might get my vote for discretion alone.

For my purposes however, the Eley Hollow Subs seemed to square-up better than others. Truth be told, they were grouping beyond me on the day, so at a guess; a little over MOA at present. I also need more time behind the bolt!

Having zero'd and played around with a few types of ammo, I loaded another mag of the Eley subs. Just before taking my first shot, a blue bottle landed in the lower right corner of the target. Sorry to admit, I couldn't resist (here come the animal cruelty crew :lol:), but I was a little bit chuffed to see it vaporised!!!

View attachment 226171






View attachment 226166

View attachment 226165

View attachment 226168
Wouldn’t want to be walking on the other side of that hedge whilst you were plinking prone!
 
…because you’d be trespassing???
No because you might catch a stray round that has bounced through the hedge - just because there's no public access you can't assume no one will be there, people turn up in the strangest places and shooting towards a hedge just shouldn't happen.
 
No because you might catch a stray round that has bounced through the hedge - just because there's no public access you can't assume no one will be there, people turn up in the strangest places and shooting towards a hedge just shouldn't happen.

I agree with the sentiment, but in this case disagree that this poses any level of threat, given the specifics of the location and that of the lay of the land.

Take another look at the reticle image. Everything in sight and fair way beyond is a solid earth backstop, well beyond the trajectory of any marginal strays. Added to the fact the opposite side of that particular hedgerow is an inaccessible river and boggy wetland… beyond which is a steep valley, all enclosed within a private estate with no public access throughout; I genuinely can’t see any risks, beyond reasonable consideration.

I do fear that casting uninformed aspersions on a public forum poses more of a threat to the credibility of our sport, than raising this privately, if the concern was indeed genuine?
 
I agree with the sentiment, but in this case disagree that this poses any level of threat, given the specifics of the location and that of the lay of the land.

Take another look at the reticle image. Everything in sight and fair way beyond is a solid earth backstop, well beyond the trajectory of any marginal strays. Added to the fact the opposite side of that particular hedgerow is an inaccessible river and boggy wetland… beyond which is a steep valley, all enclosed within a private estate with no public access throughout; I genuinely can’t see any risks, beyond reasonable consideration.

I do fear that casting uninformed aspersions on a public forum poses more of a threat to the credibility of our sport, than raising this privately, if the concern was indeed genuine?
As I say, people turn up in the strangest of places and bullets, particularly shot at very shallow angles, tend to bounce, or track along the surface then bounce.

If there was no hedge there and you had a clear view of both sides of the valley then I’d not have raised the issue.

The fact that there is every chance of a bullet bouncing through the hedge, where you cannot see, is why I commented that I would not want to be walking there.

There was a whole thread on someone posting a YouTube channel video shooting at a hedge recently, universally criticised. Reviewing by looking through the reticle doesn’t show the whole picture, looking at the shot from the firing point you are doing the same as the person in the video; shooting at a hedge when you don’t know 100% what’s behind it, you are only assuming it’s clear based on location.
 
No comment on what happens if you miss the target entirely and hit the hedge.

However if you hit the target, the ground is soft ground. The firing point is slightly elevated, the target is in a mini-valley and the ground rises again behind the target. I cannot see that bullet going anywhere except straight into the ground and then staying there.
 
Back
Top