Elephant charge in Zim

People get really upset about culling Elephant. I can understand why if they are not aware of some of the facts.

Management of Elephant numbers in certain areas of Africa is critical. They can do an immense amount of damage. Trouble is they are more confined than they used to be 100 years or so ago, this then leads to issues. Botswana has a thriving Elephant population, however in other parts of Africa Elephant numbers have crashed, mostly due to poaching, corrupt governments and human pressure for land. This is where the real conflict starts and you see a nature reserve with Elephant numbers increasing but the environment does not produce enough to sustain them. Its a complicated issue that has produced a poaching frenzy in places, not helped by corrupt officials.

However there are places where Elephants need to be culled, and in this respect if managed properly can provide a valuable income for the local people, and a huge amount of protein in one go. The cow Elephant I took only had half a trunk, probably lost through a poachers snare. Non the less I did not keep the ivory or the skin. This was taken back to the game dept and sold. The profits of which were shared amongst the tribal land holders, the game dept and the government.

I would say over 60 people turned up to collect the meat, mostly women and children. A humbling experience when you see how hungry people are. Would I do it again, YES. Would I go out just to shoot an Elephant for the shear fun of it. NO.

I have been very lucky in life and my hunting career, I have had some great adventures. One day I must sit down and write a book, but time at the moment does not allow for it.

Very well put Malcolm.
 
+1 I'd have hoped people, particularly in the hunting community, would at least take the time to look into things in a bit more detail and learn about something before making glib comments. Probably too busy murdering bambi to do so...

Fish in a barrel? Really?

Novice


I totally understand about culling anything bud and the need to keep the population in check .But to have to shoot the 2nd one ?? Because it was Charging them after the first one went down??? Just doesn't sit right with me .As I said each to there own

Glib comments.... No not at all bud ,, murdering bambi lol lol lol

Kjf
 
Culling for population control and to prevent damage etc aside (which I understand the need for), what happens with the elephant carcass? Does the carcass go into the human food chain or what? Sorry to show my ignorance, but the questions are asked out of genuine curiosity.
 
Having now viewed the video clip I can see where some might question the need to take the young bull.
Its always easy sitting behind a computer screen to pass judgement, and that is not aimed at anyone on this thread, as it is entirely different when faced with a situation such as in the video clip.
However from my own opinion they were a bit hasty in taking the second animal. It may have stopped with a warning shot first, but to say that it would have not completed the charge is a remark that I doubt anyone would make if they were standing there with it baring down on them. Believe you me Elephant can cover a short distance very quickly and a head on shot is only open to a hunter when the elephant has its trunk down and you are still at a distance where the angle to brain shoot is available. Don't forget the brain sits at the back of the head and one needs an enormous amount of penetration to reach the back of the head and with the right angle to do so.

Side on shot is always I think a better option, between the eye and the ear. But this is not available with a charging Elephant. No one can judge too much in these situations. The PH would loose his reputation and be almost finished if he lost a client. So you are faced with a dilemma, shoot to kill or risk it not finishing the charge, in which case it would be too late. Not an easy call to make?
 
Culling for population control and to prevent damage etc aside (which I understand the need for), what happens with the elephant carcass? Does the carcass go into the human food chain or what? Sorry to show my ignorance, but the questions are asked out of genuine curiosity.
Most of the meat will go into the food chain. If its tribal lands they will have eaten or taken it all away within a few hours, guts and all.
 
I totally understand about culling anything bud and the need to keep the population in check .But to have to shoot the 2nd one ?? Because it was Charging them after the first one went down??? Just doesn't sit right with me .As I said each to there own

Glib comments.... No not at all bud ,, murdering bambi lol lol lol

Kjf
Trouble with culling in Elephant herds. Most of the time once the target is down its the others you need to watch out for. Slightly different with lone bulls, but cow Elephant can be particularly problematic and a charge of some sort is highly probable.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kjf
I really can't be 4rsed to write my usual defence.

It is disappointing when hunters criticise other hunters from a different discipline just through a lack of knowledge. I have even met vegans who show more curiosity than that before crystallising their opinion.

Carl
Carl, don't the natives get to eat the meat? They are happy to get it too, correct?
 
Carl, don't the natives get to eat the meat? They are happy to get it too, correct?
Yes, Sir. Every single ounce of it. They strip the carcass clean. They also get a proportion of the trophy fee. The rest of the money goes to finance our anti-poaching operations. Hunting areas, paradoxically, have now become safe-havens for elephants in many places. If you are a smart elephant, and understand statistics, come and live with the hunters...
 
:popcorn:Let's see how long before this thread and video ends up on instagram/facebook/etc. and then on BBC...
I hope you are right. We have nothing to be ashamed of. As hunters, we really do act like the ugly kid with low self-esteem who hopes no-one will notice he showed up to the party and throw him out.

Each one of us on here contributes far more in a week to the conservation of wildlife on this planet than the average Joe will in a lifetime. I rarely meet a hunter, of any flavour, who is not a conservationist first, a naturalist second, and a hunter third. Pick your chins up off your chests and be proud. Don't hide!
 
A good read on the reality of elephant culling (or lack thereof) in Botswana, and other places.

When Bambi eats 400 pounds of hay and drinks 200lt of water every day, and has a hobby of destroying trees to nibble on a few leaves, things go sour very fast. Entire ecosystems are trashed, erosion sets in, other species disappear - and eco-warriors sip their Quadruple Mocha Latte with Vanilla, Kale, And A Hint Of Tofu contentedly, in a lala-land far away.

 
I quite like the look of the TGA. I might have to join. 500 Rand isn't a lot of money and they seem to be singing from the same hymn sheet as I generally do. I need to look into them more but first impressions are good.

I spent a great many years not agreeing with hunting elephants at all. I thought it was an awful thing to do but I hate to say it, I was sucked in by the general uneducated opinions from the media and society. Look a little deeper, the same as many of us have done with deer stalking, and you will see that some culling is essential. Although I have no desire to shoot an elephant or rhino my views have completely changed over the last five years and I support those who do so.

As for shooting that charging elephant, it's a tough call. It didn't look all that serious about the charge but I'm not a qualified PH and I wasn't there. I find it difficult to challenge their decision based upon those facts - they were under a lot of pressure and they didn't have an hour to watch the video and replay it a dozen times. They had a couple of seconds, if that.
 
For those looking for eloquent and powerful arguments on the value of hunter conservation, read Steven Rinella and listen to his podcasts (Meat Eater). Rinella has comprehensively researched the incredible impacts of hunter initiated, funded and managed conservation efforts in the US, and how many populations of various animals have rebounded to the point at which they are now requiring control.

If anything, it helps otherwise uninformed deer stalkers get their heads around the critical importance of the hunter conservationist in managing animal populations and environments, particularly those environments in which the animals must successfully co-habit with significant human populations.

Just don't expect the rabid hysterical YouTubers to take any notice of this reality, because they won't.

The challenge though - when espousing the hunter conservationist model - is seeing through the hyperbole and spotting the crooks. Unfortunately there are many countries around the world where enormous fees supposedly used for conservation purposes are simply funnelled straight into back pockets. The countries in which a lot of the exotic big game hunting is undertaken often don't have very transparent systems that can easily be audited to see what proportion of the fees are going to where they say its going.
 
For those looking for eloquent and powerful arguments on the value of hunter conservation, read Steven Rinella and listen to his podcasts (Meat Eater). Rinella has comprehensively researched the incredible impacts of hunter initiated, funded and managed conservation efforts in the US, and how many populations of various animals have rebounded to the point at which they are now requiring control.

If anything, it helps otherwise uninformed deer stalkers get their heads around the critical importance of the hunter conservationist in managing animal populations and environments, particularly those environments in which the animals must successfully co-habit with significant human populations.

Just don't expect the rabid hysterical YouTubers to take any notice of this reality, because they won't.

The challenge though - when espousing the hunter conservationist model - is seeing through the hyperbole and spotting the crooks. Unfortunately there are many countries around the world where enormous fees supposedly used for conservation purposes are simply funnelled straight into back pockets. The countries in which a lot of the exotic big game hunting is undertaken often don't have very transparent systems that can easily be audited to see what proportion of the fees are going to where they say its going.
I agree very strongly with your last point. We eventually insisted on moving to an approach where we finance specific, costed projects voted for by councils of villagers. This is after years of handing cash over to local chiefs and administrators to distribute according to their preference.
 
To each his/her own. I haven't shot any dangerous game at all and, for me, it just doesn't float my boat. But I like to shoot driven game (pheasants/partridge etc) and I know there's some on here who aren't into that at all. So I certainly wouldn't condemn anyone out of hand for anything. We all have our own likes and dislikes and what we consider acceptable. Trying to bend everyone else to your will is really just the thing antis do.

Viva la difference!
 
I am not sure he would have gotten a second shot off after a warning as he seemed to struggle to re load for a second shot.
Like I said its always difficult to judge without being on the ground at the time. The area I hunted was on the edge of Lake Kariba in Zim. We were on a Buffalo hunt, not for Elephant. However within this area they generally culled 12 cow Elephant a year, which to a certain extent made them dangerous to approach as they were used to being hunted and were not very tolerant of humans. The Elephant I culled had lost a good third of its trunk, probably through being in a poachers snare. This also made it bad tempered and not to be taken lightly when approaching it in thick Jess.
It was killed with a single brain shot from my 375HH, and most of it consumed or taken away by the locals in about 3 to 4 hours. The ivory was kept by the game department.
Hunting dangerous game is dangerous, and sometimes decisions are made that at the time seemed correct. Its easy for all of us to look at such a video and make comments about what we would do, but then we are not faced with 2 to 3 ton of Elephant about to take out its revenge on you. I would probably have shot it, too close and its all over.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mjf
Back
Top