I was just saying that I'm personally very uncomfortable that my club deposits several tonnes of lead across a small area of woods and fields each year. I'm not saying that you have to agree with me. But you cannot pretend that my concerns have zero basis, nor that I'm unusual in having them. I think that I'm far from being alone in wanting to enjoy my shooting, which I love, with a reasonably clear environmental conscience. We're a responsible bunch of people, firearms owners, and part of that, for me, is being responsible for my impact on the environment.
I'm sorry if "heavy metal contamination" feels like a loaded term. It was not my intent to trigger emotions by using it. It's just objectively what it is. When old factories are demolished the sites are often contaminated by heavy metals and this constrains what you can do with the land until it is decontaminated.
The level of contamination on a site used for clay shooting is such that you would have to be a very irresponsible parent to allow young children to be unsupervised while on the land. I think any person with even a slightly open mind would have to agree with that - children put stuff in their mouths and ingested lead is harmful to children's development. So I'm just saying that it doesn't feel like a responsible thing to do to deposit a couple of tonnes of finely divided toxic metal, every year, over some fields and woods.
No?