This is kind of how I feel about it. If we take this, then what next? How much further into the corner do we get pushed. Its like we are doing something socially unacceptable. I get the idea and I want to work with the police but if shooters are always taking a step back then where do we end up left?
I can tell you what’s next - after the implementations of a “call in system” it will be geo-tagging, whereby if you want to carry a firearm you will need to have some sort of GPS tracking to show where you are - it’s all part of the “death by one thousand cuts” system that seems to be being implemented and many shooters are happily waltzing along the path.
I remember looking at the US NRA spokespersons and thinking they were extreme and off-putting, I now understand exactly why they do not give one inch.
So far in my short time with firearms we have -
Lost the right to use pistols.
Lost the right to use large chamberings semi-autos.
Lost the right to use snares.
Had medical forms made compulsory (even though doctors have no obligation to complete them)
Having powders restricted through reach.
On the way to having ammunition materials restricted.
On the way to having licence costs elevated by 400%.
Can anyone think of any ground we have gained? The only small thing would be the ability to use less than 100gr bullets on red deer and use electronic scopes to shoot deer A why?…well, because for now it suits the governments environmental tree planting narrative.
When the deer numbers are down (and that will happen eventually in many areas) we will have those things taken again….
We need to vote in politicians who are not blind or liking to line their own pockets.