Apologies if it has been said before in the longer thread, but why does bringing a trophy back make any difference to the decision to go and hoot the animal?
I'm comfortable with the link of hunting income and conservation and morally see no difference between shooting a kudu and a red stag, but I don't understand what the problem is with the bill as it not preventing anyone going hunting. What am I missing?
Now, dear SD types, I'm asking partly as I will use this in the undergraduate course I am creating and teaching as an example of use of animals, so please, keep the comments sensible