Anything is a big step up from a 3yr plus Quantum XQ30V lite activevii , they only had a chalcogenide lens also, so a modern day higher priced thermal will be much better for you image wise..After a few days using this infiray E6+ and a number of years using the quantum xq30v lite. I'm sort of going to say I know where your coming from. The iray is to good, maybe a little to good. In a weird sort of way, I still prefer the older pulsar with is little sensor. Yes, hard work spotting rabbits over 200 yards and fox over 400. Deer after 8-900 you really need to know your grounds and what should be there.
The pulsar had really done me very well for spotting heat blobs.
The iray picks up everything, at 1000+ I can see the branch's and on the trees. I can see all the pheasants in the trees too. Every mouse in the field, all the bats for stupid distance. I know it's just time to relearn and adjust to the new way, And i dare I have a few setting to sort out. The only reason I changed to better was I need to know what's on the ground on places I don't know. I need to know if a long walk will end up just being a badger or muntjac when I'm on the foxes. I need to be able to see the difference between a lamb and a fox in the lambing fields. So I changed.
Yes a few things I'm missing at the momnet but I'll get use to it. I'm blind as a bat and at night I put the glasses away, this means I can't see the time on my phone, the pulsar had the time in the corner. I liked that.
Also the two mounting points ment I could use the bino harness to stop the neck strain.
But, the main one is the white hot for the day time and a quick press of a button turned on the red with yellow hot for night, saving the eye burn.
As said, all new, just need time in the field with the E6+ and I'm sure it will be fine.
Just have to sell the pulsar off now haha
I've invested serious amounts into thermal, I've imported units here no-one has used or even heard of and I've compared them side by side with all the known brands, I use them constantly myself in the field, what I'm not is a liar, anyone who knows me personally will vouch for that, I'm not the type to rip or pull anyones pants down... again ANYONE is welcome to come out and see exactly the points I have made. They can gain that information free or choose to ignore it... A £1k thermal will spot, a £4k thermal will spot, some will show no background detail, some will show lots of background detail, some are poor built, some are well built, some have slow processors, some have rapid processors, etc, etc so please don't think for one second I'm saying any of the above for anything else but because it's fact..It's about business. A Pulsar dealer doesn't make money from people wanting Iray, unless they have stock over, from when they were also an Iray dealer, before they weren't !
Time, and again, people state their own "personal preference", which may, or may not be the same personal preference as someone else, but this is misleading, unless someone has had the opportunity to try both, side by side. A rare thing.
It's like arguing that Swarovski is better than Zeiss, or Leica, or visa versa. Personal preference, none are "bad", it depends on what your own eyes prefer.
"Marketing, is marketing", a "sales pitch", is a "sales pitch". Owners nearly always recommend what they have at the time, because that's what they either compared, and preferred, or they just bought into, and now need to justify their choice, mainly to themselves.
I deal with this type of cr*p all the time, people telling people something is the best thing since sliced bread, when it's the limit of their experience.
I don't rate one of these brands over another, but I do rate individual units, based on application, and "MY personal preference".
Do the same, and it's hard to go wrong !
Anyone local Durham / North East, that wants a NV / Thermal night, lets organise something, let me show you first hand without the internet, the offer is there...


