Here is a CT scan of a sambar deer, with many thanks to J.Bishop. The first in the world. You can see aiming for the centre of the neck will not necessarily cause a immobilisation due to spinal injury. For me its a low percentage shot an a body party that is moving so I avoid it.
But Taff, that one wouldn't have bled a lot as I quite sure it was dead before it hit the floor? The perfect high neck shot I would have said. No heart beat and therefore not blood. Not quite the same as the miss placed shots that the other posts have described surely?View attachment 64024
Neck shots don,t always bleed a lot so can make difficult tracking, this one was amongs a group of about 40 at last light in a standing hay field, it dropped like a stone, but in the confusion, we thought it had run to the small copse, no sign of blood in the field or where the group had jumped out, got the dogs which ran back into the field, and there he was.
Definitely a bit low . Good blood trail to follow though! It does show how little margin of error there is on the big deer when neck shooting. Very important to know where the spine is located.I'm not surprised by that, it's more of a 'throat shot' than a 'neck-shot' methinks!
Very important to know where the spine is located
If in doubt then shoot again. Absolutely correct decision. What possible justifiable reason would there be not too?It is not easy when the deer is side on neck shot. I had a guest shot a 13 pointer through the windpipe. It was about 60 metres a way broadside on with nothing in front of it, we was sitting with a good rest to shoot from. I dont know if he went for a neck shot and it went a little bit wrong or a chest shot and went a lot wrong. I grabbed the rifle from him and just before I shot he shouted "it does not need a second shot". Needless to say I ignored him and shot. I not only saved the beast some suffering but I also saved a lot of work. I would not hesitate to shoot again if save to do so.




View attachment 64045View attachment 64046View attachment 64047View attachment 64048
I do take a lot of neck and head shots, IF I am confident in whats presented. It has never been because of meat damage concerns, it's to stop Sika running off into thick forestry making recovery difficult, especially on last light,
Above are photos that show what can just was easily go wrong with a chest shot. I get fed up to be honest when I hear folk decrying neck/head shots as they OFTEN go wrong.....apparently. Well I've had to track and find a lot more chest shot deer than those who have been attempted with neck shots. This was a shot taken at a buck this year that was struck low in the left shoulder. So much for 'pinning'. The bullet , 120grn from a .260, went straight through the lower shoulder, entered the lower chest as seen in the second image, then exited on the right side above brisket. There was very little blood. I saw the deer fall into a ditch in clearfell. The guest and I stood waiting for a good 10mins before going in. I needed the dog to find it. When she did it got up and ran off with her chasing and barking. The buck turned and charged her, very much alive. She continued to bay it before it got in to thick trees near to a road. I called her off to allow the buck to settle otherwise I think a long chase may have ensued on a still very mobile deer. We went back 4hrs later and I put the dog into the wood. After less than a minute she was barking and clearly with the buck. I walked in and she was baying a very much alive buck that was couched up under the tree canopy. It got up and ran off with her chasing and baying it, before it halted again and was shot. Before then I only knew from what we found it was hit in the lower chest area. That buck would have died, but no doubt suffered until it did.
Point is, I thought it was dead from reaction to the strike, I was wrong. I didn't know for certain what damage had been caused, hence we pursued it until it was dispatched. And lastly, another chest shot that went wrong. I had quite a few this year with guests, all I hasten to add can shoot! It was just one of those seasons I guess.
baguio;1048317 Not quite the same as the miss placed shots that the other posts have described surely?[/QUOTE said:I wouldn't have described mine as a misplaced shot!
The distance was about 150 yds and the POI was as intended with the deer not quite square on from behind.